Re: Certification Statistics [7:13477]

2001-07-24 Thread Ronny Jonathan

This information is very interesting ...
May I know where you get this information ? Is it reliable

Regards,
Ronny
- Original Message - 
From: cheekin 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: Certification Statistics [7:13477]


 FYI.  Breakdown by certification through May 2001
 
  US/CAN EMEA Asia/Pac Americas Japan
 CCIE 2,876  1,940  755 135  267
 CCNA87,72426,69434,231 1,972  23,689
 CCNP20,7789,633  9,244   40723,689
 CCDA14,8256,580  3,705   6521,038
 CCDP4,264  3,911  1,449   94  245
 
 cheekin




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13490t=13477
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]

2001-07-24 Thread Ronny Jonathan

The first CCIE get #1024 not #1.
That might explain why yours is #6969

Regards,
Ronny

- Original Message -
From: Allen May 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]


 I'm holding out for #6969

 - Original Message -
 From: Justin Emilio
 To:
 Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 3:10 PM
 Subject: Re: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]


  Currently cisco claims that there are 6169 CCIEs according to their
 website:
 
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html
 
  Justin Emilio
  Tech Support
  CCNP, CCDP, CSE
  MM Internet 888-654-4971
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Leonardo Borda
  To:
  Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:17 AM
  Subject: CCIE Expertises [7:13545]
 
 
   Does anyone know how many CCIE exist around the world?
   Does cisco publish that information?
  
   Leonardo Borda




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13695t=13545
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICMP type 3 code ?????????? [7:7697]

2001-06-08 Thread Ronny Jonathan

Hi Chris,

The ICMP code 13 means communication administratively prohibited (e.g.
firewall blocked)
For your case I think it was due to the access list.

Other ICMP code:
0 - network unreachable
1 - host unreachable
2 - protocol unreachable
3 - fragmentation needed and the do=not-fragment bit set
5 - source route failed
7 - destination host unknown
11 - network unreachable for type of service (TOP)
12 - host unreachable for type of service
13 - communicaton administratively prohibited (e.g. firewall blocked)
14 - host precedence violation
15 - precedence cut-off in effect

You can find more detail information from the following document in Chapter
2 Section 4 which covers ICMP in detail:
http://www.ireste.fr/fdl/ars/rpoly/pdf/s_serv2.pdf

Regards,
Ronny
CCNP
- Original Message -
From: Burnham, Chris 
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:41 PM
Subject: ICMP type 3 code ?? [7:7697]


 Question guys,
 I have received the following back from a ciso router that I
 do not have control over. ICMP type 3 code 0xd.
 hex d = decimal 13.  This code value 13 doesn't exist.  Is this due to an
 inbound access-list?  any ideas?  Look at the packet debug below and let
me
 know your opinions.

 -- IP --
 192.168.240.2   == 10.108.226.7

 ver = 0x4   hlen = 0x5  tos = 0x0   tlen = 0x38
 id = 0x739d flags = 0x0 frag off=0x0
 ttl = 0xfe  proto=0x1   chksum = 0xac08

 -- ICMP --
 type = 0x3  code = 0xd  checksum=0xf5a0
 identifier = 0x0seq = 0x0
 -- DATA --
 001c: 45 00 00 54 b0 07 40 00 fc 01 d5 d6 0a 6c e2 07
|
 E..T..@..l..
 002c: 0a d0 01 87 08 00 c9 b0 35 a1 00 00 22
|
 5...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7704t=7697
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Passed CIT - Now a CCNP!! [7:6725]

2001-06-01 Thread Ronny Jonathan

Hi Andrew,

Congratulation for you success. I am going to go for CIT next week.
Do you have any tips and suggestion about the exam ?

Regards,
Ronny
- Original Message - 
From: Andrew Larkins 
To: 
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: Passed CIT - Now a CCNP!! [7:6725]


 I passed my final exam yesterday - CIT with a score of 919.
 At last I have my CCNP.
 
 Many thanks to everyone on this list for all the informative threads and
 help with problems I have had over this pass period.
 
 Now to do my CCDP and security specialisation - anyone have any tips for
 these
 
 Thanks again
 
 
 Andrew Larkins
 BCom, CCNP, CCDA
 Bytes Technology Group Limited
 Tel :  +27 11 800 9467
 Fax : +27 11 800 9496
 Mobile : +27 83 656 7214
 Email :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 OR  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6728t=6725
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ccie written [7:5225]

2001-05-21 Thread Ronny Jonathan

 Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%.
 Thanks to the group and to boson test.
 Let's go for the lab
 
 Stefano Andrello
 CCIE written, CCNA

Wow ! what a score ...
Can you share with us what tips and book you use to prepare for
CCIE written ?

Regards,
Ronny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5233t=5225
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: dialer-group command [7:5199]

2001-05-20 Thread Ronny Jonathan

 Group,

 Is the dialer-group command on the BRI interface optional. In other words
 will the router dial if no dialer-group is configured on the bri
interface?

It depend on how you want to configure your BRI interface. Say you want to
configure it as a DDR (Dial on Demand Routing), than the dialer-group
command
is a must.

But if you configure it as a backup interface (using the backup command)
than it is not needed to use the dialer-group command

Regards,
Ronny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5202t=5199
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Multiple ISDN switch type on the same router [7:5198]

2001-05-20 Thread Ronny Jonathan

 Group,

 Is the dialer-group command on the BRI interface optional. In other words
 will the router dial if no dialer-group is configured on the bri
interface?

It depend on how you want to configure your BRI interface. Say you want to
configure it as a DDR (Dial on Demand Routing), than the dialer-group
command
is a must.

But if you configure it as a backup interface (using the backup command)
than it is not needed to use the dialer-group command

Regards,
Ronny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5201t=5198
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Multiple ISDN switch type on the same router [7:5198]

2001-05-20 Thread Ronny Jonathan

 Group,

 I got concrete information that if you have multiple bri interfaces on the
 router, all of them must be connected to
 the same ISDN switch type. How about if you have a router with multiple
PRI
 interfaces? Should I connect all the PRI interfaces to the same ISDN
switch
 type?

It is not neccessary to connect all the BRI/PRI interfaces to the same ISDN
switch.
You can configure the ISDN switch type per interface under interface
configuration mode.

Regards,
Ronny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=5206t=5198
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Show log command in switch [7:4138]

2001-05-11 Thread Ronny Jonathan

Hi,

I'm not a guru, but try show logging buffer

Regards,
Ronny
--- Cisco Newbie  wrote:
 All Guru,
 
 I would like to know is there any similiar command
 in Cisco switch(C4006) 
 that allow us to show log? Just like the one in
 router...
 
 If not, is there a way to retreive history log in a
 Cisco switch?...Thanx.
 
 Newbie

_
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
 http://www.hotmail.com.
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4153t=4138
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]

2001-05-07 Thread Ronny Jonathan

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA 
To: Ronny Jonathan 
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]


 Me think since MLS has to do with layer 2 up to layer 4. We know that
layer
 4 has ports numbers and all that. Ordinary if the ports numbers at layer 4
 at not made used of, MLS has not been accomplished. Access-list or
something
 have to be configured so that layer 4 element are used in the decision
 making. Since this is the basic defination of MLS, it then means Flow mask
 is an additional thing.

 I agree with what the cisco press book said, if you say
 set mls flow destination
 (only destination informations will be kept in the mls cache)
 or if you say
 set mls flow destination-source
 (both source and destination ip-addresses will be kept in the mls cache)
 better stil
 set mls flow full
 (All informations including port numbers will be documented in the cache)

 Good luck,
 (Also preparing for BCMSN)

 my 2 cents.
 Oletu



 - Original Message -
 From: Ronny Jonathan 
 To: 
 Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 12:10 PM
 Subject: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]


  Hi All,
 
  In BCMSN course book (Cisco Press) p233, it is stated that:
  Most Cisco documentation explains flow masks as a way to determine how
  packets are compared to entries in the MLS cache. This is inaccurate.
Flow
  masks are actually used to determine how much information about the
packet
 is
  placed in the MLS cache. The flow mask is not used to compare packets to
  existing entries in the MLS cache
 
  But from another source (Boson  Cisco Doc):
  you are introducing policy based routing and want to route differently
 based
  on source, destination, and port number. What command would you use on a
  multi-level switch to make it consider port numbers when layer 3
 forwarding ?
  the correct syntax is: set mls flow
[destination|destination-source|full].
 

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/layer3/m
 l
  s.htm#xtocidll0l940
 
  So the command set mls flow ..., is it only to determine what
 information
  to
  be kept in the mls entry or is it meant to enforce so that all packets
 going
  through the L3 switch will be compared to the mls entry according to the
 flow
  mask that has been set up by the set mls flow command ?
 
  Thanks in advance for the answer, I need it for BCMSN exam on Wednesday.
 
  Regards,
  Ronny
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3439t=3360
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]

2001-05-06 Thread Ronny Jonathan

Hi All,

In BCMSN course book (Cisco Press) p233, it is stated that:
Most Cisco documentation explains flow masks as a way to determine how
packets are compared to entries in the MLS cache. This is inaccurate. Flow
masks are actually used to determine how much information about the packet is
placed in the MLS cache. The flow mask is not used to compare packets to
existing entries in the MLS cache

But from another source (Boson  Cisco Doc):
you are introducing policy based routing and want to route differently based
on source, destination, and port number. What command would you use on a
multi-level switch to make it consider port numbers when layer 3 forwarding ?
the correct syntax is: set mls flow [destination|destination-source|full].
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/layer3/ml
s.htm#xtocidll0l940

So the command set mls flow ..., is it only to determine what information
to
be kept in the mls entry or is it meant to enforce so that all packets going
through the L3 switch will be compared to the mls entry according to the flow
mask that has been set up by the set mls flow command ?

Thanks in advance for the answer, I need it for BCMSN exam on Wednesday.

Regards,
Ronny




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3360t=3360
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Layer 3 Switching Flow Mask [7:3360]

2001-05-06 Thread Ronny Jonathan

First, thanks for your answer Drew ... but I'm still
confused ...

 It determines what information
 is stored in the mls entry and enforces all packets
 coming through the mls
 switch to be compared with the entry according to
 the flow mask specified
 with set mls flow.
How about the note in the BCMSN course book. My
interpretation for the note is:

The set mls flow is to determine what information to
be stored in the mls entry (for statistic and data
collection purpose), but NOT to enforce packets that
go through the mls switch to be compared with the mls
entry according to the flow mask specified by the
command.

 By the way, there is a difference between an L3
 switch and an mls-capable
 switch.  Make sure you don't get those confused.
What is the different ? Are you referring to the
RSM/RSFC/MSM/MSFC (MLS-RP) for the layer 3 switch and
Cat 5000/6000(MLS-SE) for the mls-capable switch ?

Regards,
Ronny

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3378t=3360
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]