RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
In the book that I read it says that you can only use fast ethernet or gig ethernet -Original Message- From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245] Hello I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read conflicting information. Can you use a 10Mbs Ethernet interface when running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet? Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet interface and others say you can use an Ethernet interface. Note: this is for my CCNP lab studies, not a production network. Thanks Colin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35277&t=35245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem telnetting into router with NAT enabled [7:35634]
Try this command: ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.1 23 209.xxx.xxx.xxx 23 extendable This will map the telnet port of the outside IP address to the inside, should work for you, let us know. ~I am having a problem telnetting into the router from the outside ~when I have NAT on the router. Once I take the ip nat outside command ~off the outside interface, I can telnet into the router from the ~outside. I can ping the NAT router regardless of whether ip nat outside ~is on the interface or not. Note that I do, of course, have the vty 0 4 ~passworded. Here's the config (edited for bandwidth purposes): ~ ~interface Ethernet0 ~ ip address 209.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0 ~ ip nat outside ~! ~interface Serial0 ~ ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 ~ ip nat inside ~ encapsulation ppp ~clockrate 200 ~! ~ip nat inside source list 101 interface Ethernet0 overload ~! ~access-list 101 permit ip any any ~ip classless ~! ~vty 0 4 ~password hrmm ~login ~! ~end ~ ~ Packets are coming into the router from the telnetting host, and NAT ~tries to do a translation on it, but fails, I think..? NOTE in ~the debug ~output: 209.xxx.xxx.xxx is the external router ip address and ~216.xxx.xxx.xxx is where I'm telnetting from. This is output from a ~debug ip nat detailed and debug ip nat port combined: ~ ~04:09:59: NAT - SYSTEM PORT for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: allocated port 0, ~refcount 55, localport -1, localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 55 ~04:09:59: NAT - SYSTEM PORT for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: allocated port 23, ~refcount 2, localport -1, localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 2 ~04:09:59: NAT: Allocated Port for 209.xxx.xxx.xxx -> 209.xxx.xxx.xxx: ~wanted 23 got 2 ~04:09:59: NAT: i: tcp (209.xxx.xxx.xxx, 23) -> (216.xxx.xxx.xxx, 3012) ~[0] ~04:09:59: NAT: TCP s=23->2, d=3012 ~04:09:59: NAT: o: tcp (216.xxx.xxx.xxx, 3012) -> (209.xxx.xxx.xxx, 2) ~[51] ~04:09:59: NAT: TCP s=3012, d=2->23 ~04:09:59: NAT: updated sys port: port 23, refcount 1, localport -1, ~localaddr 0.0.0.0, flags 1, syscount 1 ~04:11:08: NAT: expiring 209.xxx.xxx.xxx (209.xxx.xxx.xxx) tcp 2 (23) ~ ~ Any ideas? ~ ~Kind Regards, ~Tim Booth ~MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written ~- ~Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little ~temporary ~safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin, 1759 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Report misconduct ~and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35639&t=35634 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
2500 is BGP king
-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Do not say that a 2500 will not work for BGP. It will work just fine for a
default-only or partial-routes setup, and I'm sure more than one member of
this group has set it up.
-ejay
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address
space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a
couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless of
course he uses the same isp for both connections and they work with him on
setting up redundancy) But at that point he still would not have his own
asn for bgp...
-Patrick
>>> "sam sneed" 02/25/02 10:46AM >>>
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the
problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails.
BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I
got form the cisco site:
http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf
""Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco
routers
> and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of
> one of my servers, because one isp is failure.
> I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i
could
> do the change automatically to the other active isp.
> It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one
of
> my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server.
> So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp
each
> one, how to route accross the other good gateway.
>
> Thnx in advance
> Yassl
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36417&t=36371
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISP Question [7:37006]
I'm in -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3/3/2002 5:05 PM Subject: Re: ISP Question [7:37006] Ok, I'll bite... Don't start buying equipment yet. The technical component of an ISP is only one very small part of a big picture. If you're seriously thinking about starting an ISP, you first need to write a business plan that delineates your idea, your potential market, your competition, your management team, your organizational structure, your cashflow analysis, your initial funding, and your exit strategy. This includes a full and honest SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. Once you've refined your plan, show it to people who know a lot more about running a business than you do. Go visit SCORE (look them up in the phone book) and be prepared to rewrite everything you've written. Once you've got a final product, then you're going to need funding. Remember, you need to account for more than the technical equipment. You'll have to consider rents, leases, insurance, utilities, payroll, taxes, etc. Once you've got the funding, you can bring on qualified management and engineers (read experienced in this field) and let them decide on the particular equipment you'll need. If this sounds like too much to tackle, then you're not ready to run your own business. On the other hand, if you're financially well off (rich) and are determined to go forward anyway, I'll be glad to walk you down the path for a fee. ;-) Good luck, Craig At 02:35 PM 3/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Does anyone have a list of equipment for a company to become and ISP? I >also want to buy a class of IP addresses and host them myself. Is there >a link on Cisco to help someone like myself get started. Any help on >this topic would be appreciated. I really don't know where to start Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37111&t=37006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCRAN question [7:37481]
when I took the exam I had several questions on ISDN and alot on x.25, I did receive a couple on 700 series but not to many. -Original Message- From: John McCartney To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3/6/2002 5:07 PM Subject: BCRAN question [7:37481] I'd like to ask those that have passed the BCRAN was there a lot of ??'s on the 700 series? I'm reading it an its very dry and I'm trying to decide if I really need to focus on this aspect or focus on other areas. Any info is appreciated, don't break the NDA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37487&t=37481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco ACL's [7:11114]
Cisco access lists field guide by Gil Held and Kent Hundley, McGraw-Hill Technical Expert -Original Message- From: Caballero, Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco ACL's [7:4] Hi, Anyone know of a good book or source of information on Cisco Access-lists. Is there any sort of book with a plethora of examples and information on the subject? Thanks, Eddie Caballero Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP helper addresses [7:11434]
also tacacs -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP helper addresses [7:11434] both. And remeber to disable all broadcasts you do not want forwarded. By default cisco forwards the following as well as bootp/dhcp: no ip forward-protocol udp tftp no ip forward-protocol udp domain no ip forward-protocol udp time no ip forward-protocol udp netbios-ns no ip forward-protocol udp netbios-dgm These commands can be put in global config to control all vlans supporting ip helpers. -Patrick >>> "Wilson, Christian" 07/09/01 09:42AM >>> If I enter two ip helper address statements referencing two different IP addresses in my router configs, which one does the router use? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11441&t=11434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple OSPF areas on the same router [7:13108]
are you running full bgp routes on the router that you want to put 6 areas on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple OSPF areas on the same router [7:13108] Guy, A router which belongs to multiple OSPF area's is called an Area Border Router (ABR). All ABR's must belong to area 0 (The OSPF Backbone area) in addition to any other areas they belong to. For each area a router is a member of, it must store all of the LSA's for that area, and participate in the Dykstra SPF calculations for that area. So, the more area's a router is a member of, the higher the CPU and memory load on the router. Recommendations for the maximum number of areas a router should belong to vary. It isn't an exact science. The number of routers, the number of circuits (networks), and the stability of the circuits in each area will affect the max number of areas you can support on a single ABR. That said, 6 areas plus area 0 on a single router is probably to high. 3-4 areas plus area 0 is generally a good rule of thumb. Again, keep in mind there are many variables which affect how many areas a router can support and so each situation must be considered individually. ---Jon "Lupi, Guy" @groupstudy.com on 07/20/2001 01:29:41 PM Please respond to "Lupi, Guy" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Multiple OSPF areas on the same router [7:13108] Lets say you have a router with 6 DS3s, has anyone ever heard that it is not a good practice to have each DS3 be its own area? I was talking to someone and they said that it may not be a good idea to have multiple areas on the same router, but I have never heard that. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13118&t=13108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]
yes -Original Message- From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514] All Is there a way to block all unused external IP = Rajeev Karamchand MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13521&t=13514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
interface Multilink1 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x no cdp enable ppp multilink multilink-group 1 interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914] >Hello, > >We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a >link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ > >We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. >Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on >bonding, but could not come up with anything. > >Thank you. >Matt Goodhue "Bonding," to be specific, is a layer 1 technique intended for videoconferencing, and is not supported by routers. It's actually BONDING, an acronym for something that escapes me. To do it on the router, look at multilink PPP for a layer 2 solution, and also per-packet and per-flow load balancing at layer 3. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13917&t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF and Access-lists [7:14229]
ospf uses 224.0.0.5 and 224.0.0.6 -Original Message- From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF and Access-lists [7:14229] Assuming you do not have any permit statements it would be dropped. As far as I know OSPF hello's use multicast addressing. If I remember right it uses 224.0.0.10 but I could be wrong... Dennis ""Nabil Fares"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings, > > Just an insanity check..If I have deny any any access list on an > interface, would the ospf hello drop? > > Thanks, > > Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14253&t=14229 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Keep losing Cisco 3640 startup config [7:14376]
make sure the config register is set to 0x2102 and if not go into config mode and type config-register 0x2102 and do a sh ver and at the bottom it will tell you where the next boot will come from -Original Message- From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Keep losing Cisco 3640 startup config [7:14376] I would begin by checking my config register... It sounds like it may be set to bypass the stored config. - Original Message - From: "kwock99" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:30 PM Subject: Keep losing Cisco 3640 startup config [7:14376] > Hi, > > I have a Cisco 3640 router and found that everytime I power down the router, > the startup config is missing and restart the "setup". > > I have "copy run start" many times. > > Anyone has the idea to fix it? > > > Best regards > Francis Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14381&t=14376 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. ""khramov"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can > I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. > thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15908&t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643]
I can see you are a stable person -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] I don't know why it irritates me so much...it's really crazy but I can't stand hearing people say NIC Card NIC...NICjust say it!...grin... >>> "Allen May" 01/11/02 01:36PM >>> Yep...and PIN Number, ACL List, etc. I used to bug instructors by referring to them as Network Interface Card Card's to point out what NIC Card really was ;) Allen - Original Message - From: "Patrick Ramsey" To: Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:54 AM Subject: RE: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] > Is NIC Card kinda like a FAT Table? : p > > >>> "Daniel Cotts" 01/11/02 12:34PM >>> > Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) uses two pair (four wires) on pins 1&2 and 3&6 > of an RJ-45 plug. Whether it runs as full or half duplex is determined by > the connected equipment - NIC card, Hub, Switch, router, etc. > If Ethernet is running over coax cable then it is limited to half duplex. > > > -Original Message- > > From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:56 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] > > > > > > Hi, there, > > > > > > how many pairs of two-twisted cable are used for full-duplex > > Ethernet ? what > > is the > > difference between full- and half- duplex cable? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > > > > > Regrads, > > > > mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31664&t=31643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Loopback IP masking - 32 or 24 bits? or? [7:32345]
you could also do a FLRP or as known in the industry as a Full Loopback Reverse Path -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Loopback IP masking - 32 or 24 bits? or? [7:32345] Well, you could use part of the loopback subnet for a nat pool if your loopback is a public IP address, that is one reason you may want more than a /32 on the interface. Just throwing things out there. -Original Message- From: Walker, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Loopback IP masking - 32 or 24 bits? or? [7:32345] Your friend is right. Why would you use anything other than a /32 bit mask on a virtual interface? You are not going to route using the loopback address are you? Jim Walker Master Network Engineer Partners HealthCare System, Inc. Information Systems / Technical Services & Operations Tel. (617) 732-8803 Fax (617) 264-5130 This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of this message and attachments. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Joshua Dughi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Loopback IP masking - 32 or 24 bits? or? [7:32345] Hi, all; I recently started considering why I might want to have a 32-bit mask for my loopbacks as opposed to some other scheme - for instance using the regularly documented 24-bit mask on a loopback. I am speaking of course, of: Interface Loopback0 IP Address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 versus approaching this matter in this fashion: Interface Loopback0 IP Address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 So, my questions are: 1) Has any one here seen a detailed discussion of this matter? Can you provide me a link to it? 2) Based on what a friend of mine feels, his view is that there is never any benefit to having a 24-bit, or 28, or 29-bit mask on a loopback. In his view, loopbacks will always need to be, very logically, used with 32-bit masks. Can anyone please shed some light on this matter? Thank you. Joshua Dughi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32364&t=32345 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: take me off this list, Please! [7:65428]
ha ha -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: take me off this list, Please! [7:65428] Why? Are you a bad doctor? -Original Message- From: Edgar A. Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 March 2003 13:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: take me off this list, Please! [7:65428] Someone please get me off this list. I have tried everything. I used the website. Nothing works! My patients is running out. -edgar = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65470&t=65428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fast Ether Channel [7:45271]
just fast ethernet and giga ethernet -Original Message- From: Reza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fast Ether Channel [7:45271] Dear Group, Does Fast EtherChannel support Ethernet, Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet? Thanks Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45275&t=45271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BPX [7:47008]
not -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BPX [7:47008] It looks like they do: http://www.800teachme.com/cgi-bin/teachme/viewcourse.cgi?LIS1000D92&AZ Has anyone ever gone to one of their classes? If so, are they worth the money? *-Original Message- *From: craig mcguinness [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:38 AM *To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject: RE: BPX [7:47008] * * *BPX is not an ATM protocol, it is an ATM Switch. It is part of Cisco's *former Stratacom line of Carrier ATM switches. I believe *Telecordia may still offer classes on the BPX, IGX and MGX. * * * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47090&t=47008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT pool timeout [7:21206]
On a cisco router you can set the lease time by going into config t, and then into the dhcp pool name and issue the command lease 0-365 days, I think the default lease time is 1 day. -Original Message- From: Quadri, Habeeb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT pool timeout [7:21206] Hi, I am running out of addresses in nat pool. I understand that after certain time period of inactivity addresses are timed out and return to the pool. I would like to know, what is the default timeout for inactive addresses in pool and how to reduce/manage timeout after a certain period of inactivity. I researched CCO but things are not clear!!. Any comments are appreciated. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21211&t=21206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Jargon Dictionary [7:21964]
nice -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Jargon Dictionary [7:21964] A magic number is any combination of wins by team x or losses by team y. Sorry I'm a baseball fan. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22088&t=21964 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable Telnet [7:23388]
yes -Original Message- From: Chamak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Disable Telnet [7:23388] can I diable the Telnet on my router or can I restrict IP that can telnet to the router ? Mukul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23397&t=23388 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New York Study Group [7:23580]
yes, lets start one, but no one who has the name GUY can be in it -Original Message- From: Philip Jache To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/19/2001 8:24 PM Subject: RE: New York Study Group [7:23580] We could start one. Philip Jache Sports Illustrated 135 West 50th Street New York, NY 10020 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23606&t=23580 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
