Re: Bitswapping Tool [7:44385]

2002-05-20 Thread Steven Ridder

Bill Parqhurst told me.


From: Jay 
To: Steven A. Ridder 
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bitswapping Tool [7:44385]
Date: 20 May 2002 09:00:39 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from khan.execulink.net ([209.239.12.72]) by hotmail.com with 
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 20 May 2002 06:07:16 -0700
Received: (from jg@localhost)by khan.execulink.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id 
g4KD0eM08597;Mon, 20 May 2002 09:00:40 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: khan.execulink.net: jg set sender to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3
Message-Id: 
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2002 13:07:17.0110 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[4452B960:01C1]

So no token ring probably means no Source-Route Bridging?  How do you
know there is no Token Ring anymore, I find that surprising.   Is there
something that supplies what is *not* on the test?  I thought anything
was fair game except for that list on the web site that includes LANE,
LAT, AT, DECNet, etc...  Didn't see anything about Token Ring though.

On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 07:18, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
  Plus, there is no more token ring on lab.
 
 
  Darren S Crawford  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   You won't have time.  Besides nothing like would be allowed.
  
   D.
  
   At 01:49 PM 5/17/2002 -0400, Jason Greenberg wrote:
   Does anyone know if the CCIE lab gives you access to a bitswapping 
tool
   for converting mac addresses to canonical format?
   
   --
   Jason Greenberg, CCNP
   Network Administrator
   Execulink, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:
   Lucent Technologies - Enhanced Services  Sales
   NetworkCare Professional Services
   http//www.lucent.com/netcare/
   Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDP, CISSP
  
   Distinguished Member of the Consulting Staff
  
   Northwest Region - Sacramento Office
   Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310
   Pager (800) 467-1467
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:
  
   Every Job is a Self-Portrait of the person Who Did It
   Autograph Your Work With EXCELLENCE!
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44528t=44385
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ways to seperate IP and IPX traffic? [7:42855]

2002-04-30 Thread Steven Ridder

Believe me, I've confused myself.

What I have is a customer that has a mixed IP/IPX network.  ALL machines are 
dual IP/IPX, so those two protocols will be on one switchport.  He is going 
to add some servers to the network, but dosen't want IPX on that new network 
at all.  And he only wants selective IP machines talking to the servers.

What I think I'll do is just create 2 Vlans, 1 for the dual IP/IPX machines 
and 1 for the IP servers.  If a dual IP/IPX machine wishes to speak to an IP 
server, they'll have to use IP and be routed over via a L3 device.  I just 
want to make sure that the IPX traffic/babble dosen't leak onto the IP 
only network somehow just because they're on same switch.   I think with 
VLANS, it will be solved, as broadcasts and other babble will never get 
there.  But I just want to be sure.

Is my solution the way to go?


From: Patrick Ramsey 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ways to seperate IP and IPX traffic? [7:42855]
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:49:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [63.103.193.207] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
MHotMailBE98247F0068400431E23F67C1CF05480; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:50:57 -0700
Received: from 192.168.250.16 by appsrvnt92 with SMTP (SMTP Relay (MMS 
v5.0)); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:56:47 -0400
Received: from WSC-Message_Server by wellstar.org with Novell_GroupWise; 
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:49:51 -0400
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:51:08 -0700
X-Server-Uuid: 8CD06C93-AB11-4E1C-95FC-A727A4B65BA7
Message-ID: 
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.6.1
X-WSS-ID: 10D0055528979-01-01

what?

Now you've compeltely lost me!

do you want to tunnel ipx and route to various vlans?

I mean... If you have ipx on 1 interface and ip on the other, and they are 
on the same vlan, then you're done.  But they won't route between the two 
because they are two different protocols.

If you want them on two separate vlans and want to route between them, then 
you're back to square 1 and you have to place ipx and ip on on interfaces.

-Patrick

  Steven A. Ridder  04/30/02 01:20PM 
One more thing, if I can tag IP and IPX, how do I route between the 2 vlans
if one is IP and the other IPX?


Steven A. Ridder  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  That's exactly what I was looking for, but can you tag IPX.  I kept
thinking
  that you could only tag IP.   Now that I think of it, tagging is L2, so I
  could tag it, couldn't I?
 
 
  Chuck  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   in the old days of vlan switching, there was serious discussion of 
using
   vlans to separate traffic by protocol. set up ports 1,3 and 5 as IP and
   ports 2,4, and 6 as IPX. More importantly, put all those renegade
  AppleTalk
   users on their own VLAN so their traffic doesn't bother people with 
real
   work to do ( ;- )  I don't know if there is serious talk of this any
  more.
  
   Is this kinda what you had in mind?
  
   Chuck
  
  
   Steven A. Ridder  wrote in message
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What are some good ways to separate IP and IPX traffic on a LAN?
   
--
   
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
   Confidentiality Disclaimer   
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and 
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, 
Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom 
addressed.  This email may contain information that is held to be 
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may 
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this 
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this 
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.










_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42911t=42855
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]