Re: Bridging Question?can it be hub too [7:60546]
- Original Message - From: "Simmi Singla" To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:17 AM Subject: RE: Bridging Question?can it be hub too [7:60546] Hi, > Can I make the router as hub too ,suppose my requirement is like that what > ever data comes on one port should come on other,Can we configure span on > router as we do on switch. I'm also interested to know if it's possible to configure span on a router. I've posted this question earlier at Cisco NetPro forum, but I got no concrete answer on my query. Here's a repost into this group. : --snipped-- The story is like this - I have a 7204VXR router connected to a 45 Mbps satellite downlink via a HSSI interface. I have a PA-2FE-TX module on the router and currently Fa1/0 (IP: 10.1.1.254) is connected to Server A (IP: 10.1.1.1). Traffic coming in from the satellite is being routed to Server A. There is a default ip route which goes like this: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 There are access-lists implemented on Fa1/0 such that only certain ports are being permitted to be routed to Server A. The question: I would like to make use of the other FE port (Fa1/1) and implement another set of different access rules such that the traffic from the satellite will also go to Server B (IP: 10.2.2.2). The problem is traffic is only flowing to the Fa1/0 interface, and not onto the other Fa1/1 interface. How could I have two streams of data 'duplicated' out onto the two interfaces? Having another default route to 10.2.2.2 would not work as the traffic would load balance out to the 2 interfaces. Some guy I've asked mentioned something about IRB. Is this correct? Basically if this is a switch, I could think of doing a SPAN where the satellite downstream is being replicated onto 2 FE ports. How could I achieve this on a router? There's a picture of the setup at http://kan.hardware-one.com/7204.gif. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60662&t=60546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDA case study in Exam [7:59068]
- Original Message - From: "J.D. Chaiken" To: Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 1:33 AM Subject: Re: CCDA case study in Exam [7:59068] > But on my test it was all over the place. E.g. > > Case Study 1 - Question About Case Study 1 > Case Study 2- Question About Case Study 2 > Case Study 1 - Question About Case Study 1 > Case Study 3 - Question About Case Study 3 > Case Study 2- Question About Case Study 2 > Case Study 5- Question About Case Study 5 Same here. After a while I was losing concentration and was beginning to get bored of the exam! I was constantly dreading my next question would be a case study question, as that will mean I will lose precious time. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59141&t=59068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed 640-606 Support exam: [7:57533]
- Original Message - From: "Charles McKnight" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:33 PM Subject: Passed 640-606 Support exam: [7:57533] Hi Charles, > I took the Cisco 640-606 exam and finally passed the wording of the > questions was tricky like alot of people said it was. I'd like to > thank everybody for their support. A special thanks to Shawn G. > Kaminski for recommending the CCXXproductions website which I used > for all 4 exams other sources I used was Osborne books and Selftest > software pratice exams. I wish I knew that Priscilla Oppenhemier > written a book for the 640-606 exam it would have been easier to pass > it on the first attempt I know now and will put her on my list of > sources to check in the future. I just wrote 640-606 two days ago and I found it to be tricky and difficult as well. Compared to BCRAN and BCMSN, I wasn't confident about the 606 paper at all until the final scores came out telling me I had passed. I had a feeling I was going to fail after just going thru 20 questionswhew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57545&t=57533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: trunking over ethernet [7:57539]
- Original Message - From: "pauldongso" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:17 PM Subject: trunking over ethernet [7:57539] Hi Paul, > Does ethernet interface support trunking? (isl and dot1.q, or just one > of those)? > The reason for asking is all the doco i ever read only say "cisco > supports trunking on both fast ethernet and gigabit ethernet switch > links, as well as aggregated fast ang gigabit etherchannel links" > > Sounds like trunking over ethernet is not supported. Cisco states that you need to have a FastEthernet (100 Mb/s) or above to support trunking. Hence, trunking on Ethernet (10 Mb/s) interface is not supported. However, if you have only e.g. 2 VLANs and wish to route traffic between them, you can use a router with 2*10 Mbps interface and it will still work. But if you have 10 VLANs then it would be better to get a router with 100 Mbps support and perform trunking with the switch. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57546&t=57539 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494]
- Original Message - From: "Phil Lorenz" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: RE: CPU Utilization on Cat3548XL - a mystery.. [7:57494] Hi Simon, > I have an out-of-the-box Catalyst3548XL switch .There are no user > connections nor trunk connections on the switch...just a plain switch > with a > power chord But the CPU utilization shows a consistent 50%. Can > anybody > explain??? You may like to check out http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/19.html for more information. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57544&t=57494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
