clearing cef stats on an interace [7:55555]
Any body know how to clear cef stats on an interface? I need to be able to clear the counters showed by the command sho int serial4/2 stats We've got an interface that seems to be process switching 80% of it's traffic and we're trying to nail down why. K. Hunt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5&t=5 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for experiences with 7500 and POSIP [7:54486]
We are adding an OC3 to our network due to a recent contract w/ a large web hosting company. We are looking at using the POSIP card. The contract requires that they have the ability to saturate the OC3 w/o dropping any packets. I am worried that my 7500 w/ a vip2-40 will start dropping packets under heavy load, there are 3 other DS3 interfaces on the router that are at about 60% utilization. Has anyone here had any experience w/ this combination that can give me some pointers. I'm trying to not have to buy this card just to move to a 12000 in a month because it's dropping packets. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54486&t=54486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]
I wouldn't even think of using a router for this purpose unless you are only using smtp mail between your own sites and don't want outside email f/ anywhere. We run spamassasin (www.spamassasin.org) on our mail server and it cuts out 80-90% of our SPAM. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME - Original Message - From: "Marty Adkins" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:01 AM Subject: Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971] > GEORGE wrote: > > > > Hi all I have a question ,I configured my e-mail server to only accept > > local e-mail, and deny other relay , however im still vulnerable to > > spam. My question is how do the ips block other e-mail going to their > > smtp > > Do they do it by access-list? Allowing only the local network with port > > 25? > > Or just the e-mail server? > > If cisco routers have to be involved does anyone have some links. Im > > behind a pix and would like to allow only my network to use smtp. > > Network layer filtering can't really do much to prevent relaying; it > has to be done in the SMTP application. The techniques that I'm > familiar with include: > 1) Disallow mail sent to non-local (different domain) addresses unless >the SMTP source is within the local domain, as resolved in a reverse DNS. >This is simple but prevents one from sourcing mail while traveling, >using a different ISP, at work, etc. > 2) Same as #1 but require U/P authentication for outgoing mail. > 3) Same as #1 but indirectly authenticate by correlating an outgoing >mail connection with a "recent" successful POP3 fetch, which naturally >requires a U/P. My DSL ISP, Speakeasy, does this and it works quite >well. If you attempt outbound mail without having done a POP fetch >in the last several minutes, an error message tells you that you must >do that first. > > And BTW, none of these reduce spam, only the relaying of it! > > Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC o:410.757.3050, > p:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 1290 Bay Dale Drive, Suite 312 http://www.netcraftsmen.NET > Arnold, MD 21012-2325 Cisco CCIE #1289 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49040&t=48971 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to "bigger" routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49039&t=49039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IGRP & OSPF mask issue [7:46187]
I assume you mean eigrp not igrp, if you are using igrp, remember it's classfull and takes the default mask, eigrp is classless... you'll probably need to do some summarization also... if I see the configs I can fix it in 2 seconds... - Original Message - From: "Sunil Rawoorkar" To: Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:42 AM Subject: IGRP & OSPF mask issue [7:46187] > Hi , > > Is anyone there to help me out on mask issue betwn OPSF and IGRP. I shud not > use static and default routes to carry routes from OSPF to IGRP. I hv > several routes from OSPF with different mask, say /22, /21, /24, /30 . But > my igrp interface is configured for /24 mask. so is there any other solution > for this , other than static and default. > > > > sunil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46342&t=46187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
