Re: Spanning Tree Question - Root Port Selection

2001-02-10 Thread ciscolab

Nathan,

Check the original paper by Radia Perlman, or better yet have a read of
Chapter 3 of her book "Interconnections - Bridges, Routers, switches and
Internetworking Protocols" 2nd Edition.

Serge :)

- Original Message -
From: "Miller, Nathan - BSC" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:08 PM
Subject: Spanning Tree Question - Root Port Selection


 I have been looking for a while for further documentation of the process
by
 which a switch selects its root port.  Most of the books that I have
 searched for this information say something similar to the following quote
 from a CCO page: "A bridge's root port is the port through which the root
 bridge can be reached with the least aggregate path cost, a value that is
 called the root path cost."  My problem is that they all seem to stop
there.
 My question is this.  If the root path cost is the same on multiple switch
 ports, how does STA determine which is the root port?  Does it follow the
 same course as it would when selecting a designated port (root bridge,
root
 path cost, sender ID, sender port).
 Many thanks for your thoughts.
 Nathan Miller

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Patch Panel and Cisco 2511

2000-11-21 Thread ciscolab

Tai,

You need to be careful with the run length, but I have a feeling that the
problem is more to do with your pin-outs
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2500/2509/
acsvrug/cables.htm#xtocid402311
(watch out for the wrap!)

Alternatives are using the Aux port, or get one of those 2511, and use
reverse telnet!

Serge :)

- Original Message -
From: Tai Ngo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 6:58 PM
Subject: Patch Panel and Cisco 2511


 Hi All,

 I have setup console access to my routers via the Cisco RJ-2511 router.
 Everything works fine if all my routers are in the same room as my console
 server. However,  I am having problems getting it to work across patch
 panels.  I connect the roll cable from my router console port to the patch
 panel which connects to a patch panel in my server room.  I then connect
 another roll cable from the server room's patch panel to the console
server.
 When I try to telnet into the port, it just sits there.  I have tested all
 the roll cables and the patch panel ports to make sure they work.  Have I
 left something out?

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ISDN PRI MODULE

2000-11-19 Thread ciscolab

Hi Willy!

Balanced and Unbalanced is a term carried over from transmission line
theory...ie., any form of energy transfer between two points.
(It overs data, microwave, telephone circuits, radio antenna, as well as
high-voltage power distribution!)

A balanced line uses two channels (ie., conductors) for energy transmission.
What happens is that the voltage of the two conductors are equal in
strength, but opposite in direction (ie., positive and negative voltages)
with respect to ground, in this way any induced voltages (ie., interference)
are minimised = you can run this type of cable over longer distances
without corrupting the original voltage
(ie., data).
Example: G.703 interface, twin-ax cable, Cat-5 cable, RS-442, POTS copper
line (ie., TIP and RING) etc.,
Advantage: Longer distance runs with less corruption on the channel
Disadvantage: More complicated end interfaces and tends to require closer
tolerances for the cable = more expensive!

An un-balanced line is one in which the voltages are not equal, with respect
to ground.
Example: X.21 interface, RS-232, TV/Radio coax cable etc.,
Advantage: Cheaper cable, line drivers (ie., interfaces) are cheaper as well
Disadvantage: Not suitable for long distance runs

I hope that helps...on the balanced and un'balanced front!

Regards,
Serge :)

- Original Message -
From: willy george [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 2:35 PM
Subject: ISDN PRI MODULE


 Dear All,
 I have noticed that when you order an ISDN PRI module for a modular router
there are two choices available. Balanced and Unbalanced. Could any one
please tell me what the difference is between the two and what is the
advantage of using either one of them?.
 I have also noticed a line "Processmaxtime=200" in the configs of some
routers. What exactly does this particular line signify?
 Thanks in advance for your time
 Willy

 _
 Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at
 http://bol.rediff.com

 Participate in crazy auctions at http://auctions.rediff.com/auctions/



 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what is the purpose of FECN?

2000-11-19 Thread ciscolab

FECN - Forward Explicit Congestion Notification
This is a bit within the address field which notifies the receiving device
that the network is experiencing congestion.
The end device (ie., router, FRAD etc.) is informed that congestion was
experienced on route...subsequent packets could be delayed, discarded or
even damaged.

The end device *should* take remedial action to adjust to the new
transmission environment, from the source...ie., inform the source to
"throttle-back".
This is achieved by using a complimentary bit field in the address
field...BECN (Backward Explicit Congestion Notification)...in packets sent
to the source router/FRAD.

In the real world, what tends to happen, is that there is no way traffic
from upstream hosts (ie., PC's, servers etc.) can be slowed down to the
router/FRAD.
Increasing the size of the buffers (ie., memory) at the source router helps,
but this is useless in the face of severe packet loss to the destination.

Hence, the concept of "Becky and Fecky" can only be really used to detect
congestion, by setting SNMP trap conditions, not give *real*
throttle-control, as
the text books would describe!

Without a though the answers: A

Regards,
Serge :)


- Original Message -
From: Shaw, Winston Mr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'cslx' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: what is the purpose of FECN?


 Looks like a trick question.
 I would choose answer a.

 Answer b corresponds to what is called the BECN.
 The reason that it is a trick question is that the immediate reaction
would
 be to discard Answer a because FECN is not the only way to tell if a
packet
 experienced congestion.

 Winston.
 -Original Message-
 From: cslx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 10:39 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: what is the purpose of FECN?


 what is the purpose of FECN?
 a.To tell the router that a packet experienced congestion
 b.To tell the router that packets it is sending to a remote site are
 experiencing  congestion
 c.To tell the router that there is bandwidth available



 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: free Cisco VPN Book

2000-09-12 Thread ciscolab

I've been "ordering" free books from the cisco web site for serveral years
now, as well as from other vendors sites.

Let me see...that's a total of 6 books complimentary of Cisco, and another 3
from Nortel, and still counting!

Oh yes, nearly forgot about the free t-shirts, and other freebies I've been
sent.

I must have been sent well over US$200 worth of items, including shipping!

There are offers all the time, just keep on filling in the form as
usual...I've *always* got the item in the end...sometimes it's taken over 2
months!

Another thing, Cisco is located in practically every country in the
world...!

Serge :)

Ps. I live in the UK!

- Original Message -
From: Rann Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:18 PM
Subject: Fw: free Cisco VPN Book


 Wow!  No way!  Really?  :-)

 Rann Sanders, MCPx3
 Network Engineer
 DaVita

  - Original Message -
  From: "John Kaberna" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: "Rann Sanders" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Hubert Pun"
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Kenneth Lorenzo" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:53 PM
  Subject: Re: free Cisco VPN Book
 
 
  ARE YOU PEOPLE STUPID??  They don't want to send stuff to other
countries
  likely because of the high cost of shipping overseas.  Dammit people get
a
  grip.  Cisco is based in the US and I doubt they are going to stock
these
  books all over the world.  Amazing how clueless some of you people are.
 
  John
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Rann Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Hubert Pun [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kenneth Lorenzo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:28 PM
  Subject: Re: free Cisco VPN Book
 
 
   If I remember correctly, there's been discussion on here, in the past,
   regarding Cisco's dislike for sending "free offers" to other
countries.
 I
   imagine the lack of these countries being listed is not accidental.
  
   Rann Sanders, MCPx3
   Network Engineer
   DaVita
  
   - Original Message -
   From: "Hubert Pun" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: "Kenneth Lorenzo" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:03 PM
   Subject: Re: free Cisco VPN Book
  
  
   Where is Canada in the "country" option?
  
  
  
   **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
   _
   UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
   Total Renal Care
  
   **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
   _
   UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

 Total Renal Care

 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]