Re: back-to-back router connection! [7:11602]
Try 1 60-15 DTE and one 60-15 DCE cable. You should be able to plug the 2 15-pin ends together. ""chica"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > i'm located in Germany and i'm trying to connect 3-4 > routers back-to-back to simulate a WAN connection in a > lab.Over here in Germany we use the cable specs of > X.21 > which is a 60-15 pin cable.The 60 pin end will fit in > one WIC 1T wan interface card,but the other end cannot > fit into the other router's WIC 1T interface,it only > fits in the AUI port.I want a situation where i would > connect router A's s0 to router B's s0, and not a > connection from s0 to AUI.Is there a way of getting > around this?I have searched the cisco' website,but > still can't figure it out.While configuring one router > as DCE and the other as DTE what should i watch out > for,or what command would do this. > I'ld appreciate it if anyone could come out with a > solution. > Thank you. > >chika > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11603&t=11602 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: back-to-back router connection! [7:11602]
Cool! Its on his web site at http://www.optsys.net/shoponline.htm. Wish I'd had this info a few months ago. Searched all over for a cable just like that. ""Dennis Laganiere"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Talk to Brad at OptSys, he's got a good price on a short DCE/DTC cable. > It's much cheaper then buying two 6 foot $65 cables to connect two routers > two feet appart on a rack. Send me an e-mail if you have trouble finding > Brad, but he's on the list, and by the way, a really good guy. Good luck. > > --- Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: no mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: back-to-back router connection! [7:11602] > > > Try 1 60-15 DTE and one 60-15 DCE cable. You should be able to plug the 2 > 15-pin ends together. > > ""chica"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > i'm located in Germany and i'm trying to connect 3-4 > > routers back-to-back to simulate a WAN connection in a > > lab.Over here in Germany we use the cable specs of > > X.21 > > which is a 60-15 pin cable.The 60 pin end will fit in > > one WIC 1T wan interface card,but the other end cannot > > fit into the other router's WIC 1T interface,it only > > fits in the AUI port.I want a situation where i would > > connect router A's s0 to router B's s0, and not a > > connection from s0 to AUI.Is there a way of getting > > around this?I have searched the cisco' website,but > > still can't figure it out.While configuring one router > > as DCE and the other as DTE what should i watch out > > for,or what command would do this. > > I'ld appreciate it if anyone could come out with a > > solution. > > Thank you. > > >chika > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11610&t=11602 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: looking for tech support newsgroup [7:11769]
""john"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > I'm in the wrong newsgroup. I wondered if anyone could point me in the > direction of a cisco tech support newsgroup. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11778&t=11769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: looking for tech support newsgroup [7:11769]
Don't know why it didn't stick last time. comp.dcom.sys.cisco ""john"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > I'm in the wrong newsgroup. I wondered if anyone could point me in the > direction of a cisco tech support newsgroup. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11779&t=11769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List problem. [7:12525]
I like Jeremy's answer. It seems like the permit all at the end makes everything else except the denies redundant. ""Jeremy Felt"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a familiar feeling that I'm going to be completely off on this one, > but hopefully the correct answer will be posted so I can figure out why. > > As long as the correct "deny" statements are there, it seems to me that the > other "permit" statements would be redundant when used with the "permit all" > statement at the end. > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > Looking forward to the answer, > > - Jeremy Felt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Original Message - > From: "Robert Fowler" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:05 PM > Subject: Access List problem. [7:12525] > > > > Someone sent me this and I just can't figure it out. I've been staring at > it > > and trying things since last week. Any ideas? > > > > > > Jeff Doyle says this access-list can be rewritten with 3 lines and still > > provide the same functionality. Let me know if you guys figure out: > > > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.6 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.30.95 0.0.0.0 10.11.12.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.30.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.27 0.0.0.0 > > access-list 101 permit ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.31.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255 > > access-list 101 deny ip 172.22.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.18.64 0.0.0.63 > > access-list 101 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 > > > > Have fun... > > > > > > Thank You, > > Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12544&t=12525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN link funnies - UP UP but no comms- on same subnet!!! [7:12824]
I have seen weird behavior from a burned serial port. All reported up but no traffic moving. ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > HI all, > > Strange problem here. > > The serial interface are UP UP on both sides, but we are not able to ping > each other - even though directly connected. A "debug ip ICMP" on the > remote site shows the ping coming through and replying, but the reply never > gets back. > Also the remote site saw my router using CDP, but I do not see him. > > Any ideas?? > > I believe this is Telco related, but the line shows clean from the interface > stats > > Andrew Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12824&t=12824 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reference material on pings?? [7:13107]
Does this help? http://ftp.arl.mil/%7Emike/ping.html ""Jim Newton"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am trying to find an in-depth guide to pings. I notice with my sniffer > that when I issue a ping from my laptop that there are three requests for > each reply. Is this normal? > > Also I want to learn more about the TTL field. Do routers really only > decrement it by one as the packet passes through? > > I just have a few questions about the nuts and bolts of this and probably > traceroute also, stuff that isn't in the normal books. > > I have read the RFC and what I want is not there. I have also looked around > CCO quite a bit, and haven't found anything, not that this means that the > info is not there. > > If anyone knows of a good book or on-line source, I would appreciate it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13126&t=13107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
