Re: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-21 Thread Nakul Malik
interfaces send a keepalive-type loopback packet every x no of seconds to
verify the interface's integrity. same thing happens at POST.
The message means faulty Hardware. More specifically, it is probably the Rx
of your interface that has failed.
Solution=Hardware replacement.
-Nakul

Firesox  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Folks,
 I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.

 C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:

 C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received



 It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
 vice versa.



 Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?



 Thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72696t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-18 Thread Firesox
Folks,
I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.

C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:

C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received



It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
vice versa.



Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?



Thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72563t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-18 Thread John Neiberger
 Firesox 7/18/03 6:03:15 AM 
Folks,
I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.

C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:

C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received

It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
vice versa.

Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?

Thanks in advance.


http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/164.html#topicsub1

It appears that your 3500XL has faulty hardware on that interface. If this
is a new switch you need to return it with an RMA, or you can get a
replacement if you have it under contract.

HTH,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72572t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-18 Thread Daniel Cotts
Sounds like the transmit on the 3524 and the receive on the 2950 is OK. The
transmit on the 2950 or the receive on the 3524 seems to be suspect. Is
there another box with a gig interface to which you can connect the 3524 to
test it? A spare GBIC to test? Try reseating the GBIC or cleaning the fiber
connection - I'll leave that to those with more experience in that area to
describe the proper method to use. 

 -Original Message-
 From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]
 
 
 Folks,
 I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message 
 at the boot.
 
 C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:
 
 C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received
 
 
 
 It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via 
 CDP, but not
 vice versa.
 
 
 
 Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?
 
 
 
 Thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72577t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-18 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
Yes, I have seen it on one of my boxes. It's a hardware problem. Open a TAC
case and they'll probably RMA it.

Shawn K.

-Original Message-
From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

Folks,
I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.

C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:

C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received



It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
vice versa.



Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?



Thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72580t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

2003-07-18 Thread David Cooper
On Friday 18 July 2003 10:47, you wrote:
 Yes, I have seen it on one of my boxes. It's a hardware problem. Open a TAC
 case and they'll probably RMA it.

 Shawn K.

 -Original Message-
 From: Firesox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: 3524XL Error Message [7:72563]

 Folks,
 I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.

 C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:

 C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received



 It is connected to 2950G-24.  2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
 vice versa.



 Has anyone seen this error messgae/condition?



 Thanks in advance.

Yea, I've got a couple 3524 with the FastEthernet's out. They seem to go in 
blocks of 4 ports at a time for those. Haven't seen GigE's drop though... 
yet. Definatlly hardware, like a circut protection device popped. Dunno
about
that for optical though.

Dave




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72586t=72563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]