Re: ACRC v. BSCN
"Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For those who had the occasion to either take (or compare) the ACRC and BSCN > exams, did you feel they were very, somewhat or not similar? I've been > reviewing the ACRC guide to keep that info fresh, awaiting the BSCN guide, > and wonder if this is a good idea or bad. I also wonder that, if one knows > ACRC, will one have a good foundation for the BCSN (say a good 60% to 70% of > the knowledge) or are they too dissimilar of a guide/course to carry each > other? > > Any thoughts would be appreciated...even off line! If you use just the old ACRC material for the exam you will probably fail it. The new exam covers BGP in depth, OSPF in NBMA environments, and hardly deals at all with IPX or Appletalk. If you use the ACRC materials you are well-advised to read everything you can on BGP at Cisco's web-site. Also know what a "regular expression" is in terms of Cisco lists. MLC > > > Rob Montgomery CCNA MCP > Information Security Engineer > IA Systems Analyst > Sytex, Inc./ Naval Special Warfare Command > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACRC v. BSCN
Dude, I am in class this week(today was the first day), for the BCSN and its way different than the ACRC. More focus on Distanve Vector/Link State Protocols, Address summarization and from the look of the text, BGP. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 3:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ACRC v. BSCN > > > For those who had the occasion to either take (or compare) the > ACRC and BSCN > exams, did you feel they were very, somewhat or not similar? I've been > reviewing the ACRC guide to keep that info fresh, awaiting the BSCN guide, > and wonder if this is a good idea or bad. I also wonder that, if > one knows > ACRC, will one have a good foundation for the BCSN (say a good > 60% to 70% of > the knowledge) or are they too dissimilar of a guide/course to carry each > other? > > Any thoughts would be appreciated...even off line! > > > Rob Montgomery CCNA MCP > Information Security Engineer > IA Systems Analyst > Sytex, Inc./ Naval Special Warfare Command > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACRC v. BSCN
ACRC + BGP - Access Lists -(most) IPX stuff = BSCN. They get more in depth on the routing protocols. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACRC v. BSCN For those who had the occasion to either take (or compare) the ACRC and BSCN exams, did you feel they were very, somewhat or not similar? I've been reviewing the ACRC guide to keep that info fresh, awaiting the BSCN guide, and wonder if this is a good idea or bad. I also wonder that, if one knows ACRC, will one have a good foundation for the BCSN (say a good 60% to 70% of the knowledge) or are they too dissimilar of a guide/course to carry each other? Any thoughts would be appreciated...even off line! Rob Montgomery CCNA MCP Information Security Engineer IA Systems Analyst Sytex, Inc./ Naval Special Warfare Command **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACRC v. BSCN
For those who had the occasion to either take (or compare) the ACRC and BSCN exams, did you feel they were very, somewhat or not similar? I've been reviewing the ACRC guide to keep that info fresh, awaiting the BSCN guide, and wonder if this is a good idea or bad. I also wonder that, if one knows ACRC, will one have a good foundation for the BCSN (say a good 60% to 70% of the knowledge) or are they too dissimilar of a guide/course to carry each other? Any thoughts would be appreciated...even off line! Rob Montgomery CCNA MCP Information Security Engineer IA Systems Analyst Sytex, Inc./ Naval Special Warfare Command **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
