RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
I checked with an instructor for ACRC since I didn't have any way of checking myself. He said that as of 12.0 ip classless is the default. The question is now, as Constance points out, is what version of IOS is assumed on the exam? -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless? doesn't 12.0 default to classless? I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong... - Don -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless? Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
Ok, maybe I'm a ditz. I've been telling people that when you are preparing for a test you are expected to understand the default behavior of the IOS version you are being tested on. If the question does not specify a different configuration from the default, then assume the default. Sometimes the information is implied by some configuration detail and not directly stated, so. you have to think through all the implications of the information you are given. If that is correct then the question becomes, what version is the test based on and what is the default behavior of that version? If I'm way off track just slap me, after all those years running the help desk I'm used to it and I respond quite well to that type of correction. grin C. "Dale Holmes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Don't you just love the new exam outline? Looks like they gave up the sushi at those meetings and just went with the tequila... [=`) Dale From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless? Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 14:20:07 -0400 Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
The latest version (2.1) of Cisco's Networking Academy curriculum still teaches classful addressing. It does however now mention VLSM for the first time as an advanced topic. This curriculum was released around Jan/Feb this year. My guess would be that at the CCNA level you would still assume classful unless the test indicates otherwise. Tom Lisa, Instructor, CCNA, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong... - Don -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless? Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
doesn't 12.0 default to classless? I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong... - Don -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless? Does anyone have a sense of whether the assumption has changed to classless addressing, subnet zero, etc.? The new Cisco page has even less information than before. "TCP/IP" is not exactly what I would think of as a sufficient study guide. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
