Brad, I believe our list member when he says that he has that module working so whether "it works" or not really isn't the issue. The issue is how up to date information is on CCO. Especially when that is our main resource for determining configuration etc. I'm only pursuing this as far as I am because I have made what I think are incorrect assumptions based on info found on CCO. A client doesn't care why you were wrong - just that you were wrong. I can tell a client that hey! I got it working in my lab but if it isn't blessed by Cisco - you can't get maintenance. This incident isn't my first problem with CCO documentation. It is very easy to find conflicting information but sometimes very difficult to get someone to investigate it, especially in a timely manner. So it would be great if you report on whether it "works" but the real question is whether it is supported for warranty purposes or even if TAC will try to fix something that includes that module in a "non-supported" platform. Which is what Chris might find out for us - but even that won't be too helpful except maybe to finally get someone to try a bit harder in getting the proper info on CCO. I know that many new products and IOS versions are hitting the site every day but without co-ordination it will be difficult to use them effectively. Another twist to this is that the router that is working now with the module - the module was bought after the router. Did a reseller/partner advise that the module worked or did the owner just plop it in there? In either case - can the module be returned? Is it Cisco's fault that a separate piece was bought and then installed although it is not supported? This is the type of problem that inaccurate info can cause and with the price of Cisco gear you don't like to mess around - let alone buying something for a production network and finding out it doesn't work and having to back out of an upgrade. Or worse, you build it and find out that you can't get support for it! (even though you used Cisco provided information) Anyway, I can imagine that the list is getting tired of this thread, even though I'm doing most of the complaining (or because of it) I know that I'm getting tired of it...... so I'll just wait to see what Chris digs up. Kevin "Brad Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 95q92b$pbl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:95q92b$pbl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Chris/Wigle, > > Im getting a 2611 in this week. I have a few modules in stock that I will > try it with. I'll use 12.1.5T IP as the version of IOS on the router. I > will post my findings on groupstudy with the modules I have in stock. > > -Brad _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
