Re: Carrier Lost [7:40230]
This won't solve the problem as I want to write a TCL script to do this. I believe there should be some way to do this, either by some command or some flag manipulation at hardware level. /N Marko Milivojevic wrote: > Is it an option to insert a device in between those two routers > for testing purpses? > > If it is, I think it would be relatively simple to make a simple > device that will act as an electrical switch, that could break the > connection. Connect this with some timer (we're talking relatively simple > electronics here + it could be computer controlled - see Linux Coffee-HOWTO > for details on this). and you can have what you need. > > Of course, this most probably violates cable standards/recommendations, > but this is what you want in the end - errors ;-) > > Marko. > > - Original Message - > >From: PING > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:41:23 -0500 > >Subject: Carrier Lost [7:40230] > > > >If I have a setup: > >R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 > >I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were > >pulling the cable > >out at R1 and this message should come up: > >1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? > > > >A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1 will not cause a carrier lost at > >R1. > >Also, administrative shutdown.is not the solution. > >I want to automate this because I need to do this repeatedly. > >Question: Is there any command or other way to cause this at R1 without > >jittering the cable? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40258&t=40230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Carrier Lost [7:40230]
Is it an option to insert a device in between those two routers for testing purpses? If it is, I think it would be relatively simple to make a simple device that will act as an electrical switch, that could break the connection. Connect this with some timer (we're talking relatively simple electronics here + it could be computer controlled - see Linux Coffee-HOWTO for details on this). and you can have what you need. Of course, this most probably violates cable standards/recommendations, but this is what you want in the end - errors ;-) Marko. - Original Message - >From: PING >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:41:23 -0500 >Subject: Carrier Lost [7:40230] > >If I have a setup: >R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 >I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were >pulling the cable >out at R1 and this message should come up: >1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? > >A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1 will not cause a carrier lost at >R1. >Also, administrative shutdown.is not the solution. >I want to automate this because I need to do this repeatedly. >Question: Is there any command or other way to cause this at R1 without >jittering the cable? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40236&t=40230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carrier Lost [7:40230]
If I have a setup: R1 (E3/3)-(E2/3) R2 I want to make R1 think that it has lost the carrier as if I were pulling the cable out at R1 and this message should come up: 1d02h: %AMDP2_FE-5-LOSTCARR: Ehernet3/3 cable/transceiver problem? A line flap by doing shut/no shut at R1 will not cause a carrier lost at R1. Also, administrative shutdown.is not the solution. I want to automate this because I need to do this repeatedly. Question: Is there any command or other way to cause this at R1 without jittering the cable? Nadeem == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40230&t=40230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
