Hi All,
 
Can somebody help me out on configuring one of these setups? I have
research the web and have documentation on getting Pix to work with
Sonicwall using IKE.  Basically one side would have a sonicwall while
the other would be the Pix.  That would work but my boss wants to use 2
Sonicwall boxes and wants one of them to be on the Pix's DMZ.  My
question is would this be possible.  
 
Sonicwall A would be at another company's A site which is providing me
with a 192.168.100.1 for our Sonicwall for the LAN and a 205.202.22.12
for the WAN.  Company A has given us an internal 194.100.1.230-249 range
with 194.100.1.250 being the default gateway for our PCs.  For pcs to go
out through the VPN to our 192.168.1.x network, I would request that
they put a route on their gateway which I think is their firewall to
route 192.168.1.x traffic to the our sonicwall box.  
 
On the other end is a Pix Firewall with 3 interfaces, inside,outside,
and dmz.   All traffic going to the outside is Port Address Translated
to a specific ip address.  The DMZ is in the 172.22.100.x network. The
pix is currently setup to do nat from the inside to the dmz via nat
command.  The Inside network is using private ip address network of
192.168.1.x.    Is there a way to allow traffic that is originating from
192.168.1.x and going to 192.168.100.x to be allowed to reach the
Sonicwall via the DMZ interface?  I know you can do a route
192.168.100.x via 172.22.100.10(sonicwall's ip address on the dmz) but
would this work?  Would the system on the other side be able to figure
out how to route the VPN traffic back?   There's an access-list command
nonat that I could use but I am not sure how I could get it to work
here.
 
Any ideas on whether this is possible or anyone who has done something
like this?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26195&t=26195
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to