Re: Coil pinnaccle header
I haven't seen that error yet, but I can telly you this. The COIL chip is sits on the 6500 Fast Ethernet Blades. Each Coil chip is responsible for up to 12 FE ports. They are mostly responsible for TX RX buffering, CRC checks, and queing The PINNACLE chip is found on the Gig E and Fast E line cards. Each Pinnacle chip handles either 4 Fiber XCVR ports or 4 Coil chips. It can handle CRC checks, Queueing, putting packets on the switch bus, and so on. Don't know if that helps you any. Either way, if it is a group of 12 ports or a group of 48, it is still that entire blade that would have to be replaced to get them all working. If you have a maintenance contract I would turn it in to them. Hi all, I have 4 6509 cats that are giving me problems. For particular modules on the switch, user will not be able to login to network. I move them to different module on same switch all works fine. I look at switch, port status all is fine. I check logs on switch and I see for the ports giving me problem it reports "Coil Pinnacle Header Checksum Error". What the hell is this? I searched Cisco's site and find nothing. Has anyone seen this? Please help. I am about the thought out the damn Module. Thanks Rob Rob Mears III, NNCSS, NNCDS, MCSE, CNE, CCNA, A+ Technical Mercenary _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coil pinnaccle header
Hi all, I have 4 6509 cats that are giving me problems. For particular modules on the switch, user will not be able to login to network. I move them to different module on same switch all works fine. I look at switch, port status all is fine. I check logs on switch and I see for the ports giving me problem it reports "Coil Pinnacle Header Checksum Error". What the hell is this? I searched Cisco's site and find nothing. Has anyone seen this? Please help. I am about the thought out the damn Module. Thanks Rob Rob Mears III, NNCSS, NNCDS, MCSE, CNE, CCNA, A+ Technical Mercenary -Original Message- From: Joe Schnerd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX Nat vs. IOS Nat for DNS I have a question along the same line... If I have a single DNS behind NAT and I want to change it's IP to 10.x.x.x, how does NAT/Firewall know to forward the request to that address and how would I register with Network Solutions so that there is a "virtual" name server? Any suggestions/ideas? I've been looking at some sample NAT configs, but nothing really addresses the DNS aspect. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Jeff "Brian Bieber" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... My question is about DNS queries through the PIX and the IOS w/NAT. This is taken from the Cisco web site. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/458/41.html#Q21 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/458/41.html#Q21 Q: Does Cisco IOS NAT support DNS queries? A: Yes, Cisco IOS NAT will translate the address(es) which appear in DNS responses to name lookups (A queries) and inverse lookups (PTR queries). Thus, if an outside host sends a name-lookup to a DNS server on the inside, and that server responds with a local address, the NAT code will translate that local address to a global address. The opposite is also true, and is how we support IP addresses overlapping: an inside host queries an outside DNS server, the response contains an address that matches the access-list specified on the "outside source" command, so the code translates the outside global address to an outside local address. Time-to-live (TTL) values on all DNS resource records (RRs) which receive address translations in RR payloads are automatically set to zero. Cisco IOS NAT does not translate IP addresses embedded in DNS zone transfers. My question is how do I achieve this in the PIX? Thanks Brian Bieber _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subject: Coil pinnaccle header
Comments inline. I have 4 6509 cats that are giving me problems. Congratulations on having four 6509s to play with. Sorry about the problems. For particular modules on the switch, user will not be able to login to network. I move them to different module on same switch all works fine. I look at switch, port status all is fine. When you say that the user will not be able to log into the network, are you also saying that each and every port on each of these modules are configured alike? For example, can I presume that these are access ports you are referencing, and as such all have received the "set port host" command? What indications are you getting of trouble. Can these hosts ping each other? Can they ping their default gateway? How far (if at all) can they get? Do they even get a link light? Have you attempted to fully reseat the modules in question, or swap them out with a different slot? I check logs on switch and I see for the ports giving me problem it reports "Coil Pinnacle Header Checksum Error". What the hell is this? I searched Cisco's site and find nothing. I can only infer about what it is, but my SWAG type guess would be some form of an ASIC, such as the SAINT, Phoenix, etc. Regarding the specific error, you may want to look at this link (watch wrap): http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/reln otes/78_6218.htm Search within the page for both "coil" and "pinnacle". Also read the note on reseating the modules from a pinnacle synch error. To wit: If you see minor hardware failures or Pinnacle sync errors on bootup, reconfirm that the supervisor engine and all the switching modules are fully seated, the ejector levers are fully depressed, and the thumbscrews are fully tightened. HTH, Paul Werner Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
