Re: Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert

2000-08-31 Thread David Ristau

Sorry folks, I should have been clearer...

I do not wish to compromise my network by giving out real IP addresses
I chose 10.x.x.x and 12.x.x.x. only as an example IP address..



David Ristau wrote:
 
 a web site say 12.0.0.1 sits out on a public network,
 
 a user across the nation, say in Oregon, on his workstation
 host 10.0.0.5 cannot ping the server at 12.0.0.1
 
 the user telnets into his Cisco router at 10.0.0.1 and
 can ping the server at 12.0.0.1
 
 the user goes out the the internet to several looking-glass
 sites and can ping/tracert to the server.
 
 There are no filters on the 10.0.0.1 router
 
 it appears there are no filters in the path to the
 12.0.0.1 router from the 10.0.0.1 router
 
 any ideas why this happening or ways to figure it out...
 
 ___
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert

2000-08-30 Thread David Ristau


a web site say 12.0.0.1 sits out on a public network,

a user across the nation, say in Oregon, on his workstation
host 10.0.0.5 cannot ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user telnets into his Cisco router at 10.0.0.1 and
can ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user goes out the the internet to several looking-glass
sites and can ping/tracert to the server.

There are no filters on the 10.0.0.1 router

it appears there are no filters in the path to the
12.0.0.1 router from the 10.0.0.1 router

any ideas why this happening or ways to figure it out...

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert

2000-08-30 Thread analogkid01

Do all of the intermediate routers along the path to the server know about the network 
10.0.0.5 is on?  They might know of *a* network to get back to the router (which is 
why you can ping the server from the router), but for some reason they don't know 
about that network specifically.

Hope this helps -

Bradley Wilson
CCNA, CCDA, CCSE, MCSE, MCT, CTT


David Ristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
a web site say 12.0.0.1 sits out on a public network,

a user across the nation, say in Oregon, on his workstation
host 10.0.0.5 cannot ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user telnets into his Cisco router at 10.0.0.1 and
can ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user goes out the the internet to several looking-glass
sites and can ping/tracert to the server.

There are no filters on the 10.0.0.1 router

it appears there are no filters in the path to the
12.0.0.1 router from the 10.0.0.1 router

any ideas why this happening or ways to figure it out...

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert

2000-08-30 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

Your subject line contains tracert, but no info about tracert result in your
message.

What happens when you tracert 12.0.0.1 from 10.0.0.5?

In order for ping to work, both source and destination must be able to see
each other.

Check if your router routing on both networks (12.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.0)?

Router#show conf

router rip (or another rp)
 network 10.0.0.0
 network 12.0.0.0

Check if your router has any access lists enabled that prevents the outside
from seeing the inside.

Router#show ip access-list

Hth,

Ole


 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.insync.net/~drews/ccnp





-Original Message-
From: David Ristau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert



a web site say 12.0.0.1 sits out on a public network,

a user across the nation, say in Oregon, on his workstation
host 10.0.0.5 cannot ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user telnets into his Cisco router at 10.0.0.1 and
can ping the server at 12.0.0.1

the user goes out the the internet to several looking-glass
sites and can ping/tracert to the server.

There are no filters on the 10.0.0.1 router

it appears there are no filters in the path to the
12.0.0.1 router from the 10.0.0.1 router

any ideas why this happening or ways to figure it out...

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Connectivity Issues with ping/tracert

2000-08-30 Thread Jay Hennigan

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, David Ristau wrote:

 
 a web site say 12.0.0.1 sits out on a public network,
 
 a user across the nation, say in Oregon, on his workstation
 host 10.0.0.5 cannot ping the server at 12.0.0.1
 
 the user telnets into his Cisco router at 10.0.0.1 and
 can ping the server at 12.0.0.1
 
 the user goes out the the internet to several looking-glass
 sites and can ping/tracert to the server.
 
 There are no filters on the 10.0.0.1 router
 
 it appears there are no filters in the path to the
 12.0.0.1 router from the 10.0.0.1 router
 
 any ideas why this happening or ways to figure it out...

* The netmask or gateway on the workstation 10.0.0.5 is misconfigured.

* Assuming that the 10. addresses are really what is used, NAT is not 
  properly configured on the router.  

-- 
Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323 

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]