Re: Deleting a local network route

2000-11-25 Thread Jason Roysdon

Deleting a local network routeEver change the ip and gateway, or even just
the gateway on an NT/Windows 2000 box?  It'll want to reboot to make the
change.  Why reboot a server when you can manually put in the change in two
command lines?
route delete 10.11.12.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 10.11.12.13
route add new-ip_x.x.x.x MASK new-mask_x.x.x.x new-gateway_x.x.x.x

There, no need to reboot.  Oh, and re-reading this, yes, you still need to
specify the new IP and gatway first, but you just answer "no" to reboot
afterwords.

Anyone notice how on Windows 98SE (might be on other versions) that you can
change your manaul DNS info, it'll want to reboot, but you don't have to,
it's already taken affect?  (All other changes require a reboot).
Interesting how Microsoft decided to pick and choose on stuff like that
(perhaps that one is a fluke).

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


""Dusty Harper"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om...
I was curious if someone could rationale why a network engineer would want
to delete the local network route out of a route table.
For example if your route table looked comparable
Dest.   MaskGtwyInt
Metric
127.0.0.0   255.0.0.0   127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1   1   <-Loopback
10.11.12.0  255.255.255.0   10.11.12.13
10.11.13.13 1   <-local network  (One to be deleted)
10.11.12.13 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1   127.0.0.1
1   <--local host
10.11.12.255255.255.255.255 10.11.12.13 10.11.12.13
1   <--local network broadcast
192.168.20.0255.255.255.0   192.168.20.111
192.168.20.111  1   <-local network
192.168.20.111  255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1   127.0.0.1
1   <--local host
192.168.20.255  255.255.255.255 192.168.20.111
192.168.20.111  1   <--local network broadcast
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.11.12.13 10.11.13.13 1
<--broadcast
Why would someone need to or want to manually delete out a local
network route?  it is to my understanding that 3 routes need to exist for
basic connectivity via TCP/IP (besides the loopback and broadcast):
The local host
The local network
The local network broadcast
Any feedback is appreciated
Dusty Harper
MCSE + I + DBA
A+, Network+, i-Net+
CCNA, CCDA


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Deleting a local network route

2000-11-12 Thread Dusty Harper
Title: Deleting a local network route






I was curious if someone could rationale why a network engineer would want to delete the local network route out of a route table.

For example if your route table looked comparable


    Dest.           Mask            Gtwy        Int     Metric  

    127.0.0.0       255.0.0.0       127.0.0.1   127.0.0.1   1       <-Loopback

    10.11.12.0      255.255.255.0       10.11.12.13 10.11.13.13 1       <-local network  (One to be deleted)

    10.11.12.13     255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1   127.0.0.1   1       <--local host

    10.11.12.255        255.255.255.255 10.11.12.13 10.11.12.13 1       <--local network broadcast

    192.168.20.0        255.255.255.0       192.168.20.111  192.168.20.111  1       <-local network  

    192.168.20.111      255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1   127.0.0.1   1       <--local host

    192.168.20.255      255.255.255.255 192.168.20.111  192.168.20.111  1       <--local network broadcast

    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.11.12.13 10.11.13.13 1       <--broadcast


    Why would someone need to or want to manually delete out a local network route?  it is to my understanding that 3 routes need to exist for basic connectivity via TCP/IP (besides the loopback and broadcast):

    The local host

    The local network

    The local network broadcast


    Any feedback is appreciated


Dusty Harper

MCSE + I + DBA

A+, Network+, i-Net+

CCNA, CCDA