Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Hi, You may want to take a look at -- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html Please watch the line wrap. Matt Goodhue wrote: Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13963t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Please keep in mind that just because you have 2 links to the same provider, it does not necessarily mean that they are run to the same POP. this can cause some problems with load balancing 2 different links. -- Michael Damkot Technical Trainer Network Support Engineer II Makarand Yerawadekar wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, You may want to take a look at -- http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html Please watch the line wrap. Matt Goodhue wrote: Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14024t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13914t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Bonding, to be specific, is a layer 1 technique intended for videoconferencing, and is not supported by routers. It's actually BONDING, an acronym for something that escapes me. To do it on the router, look at multilink PPP for a layer 2 solution, and also per-packet and per-flow load balancing at layer 3. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13915t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
interface Multilink1 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x no cdp enable ppp multilink multilink-group 1 interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation ppp ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ppp multilink multilink-group 1 -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914] Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Bonding, to be specific, is a layer 1 technique intended for videoconferencing, and is not supported by routers. It's actually BONDING, an acronym for something that escapes me. To do it on the router, look at multilink PPP for a layer 2 solution, and also per-packet and per-flow load balancing at layer 3. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13917t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]
excerpted below: Bandwidth ON Demand Interoperability Group (BONDING) Bandwidth ON Demand Interoperability Group (BONDING) is used for combining B channels together to increase bandwidth. Inverse multiplexing is used to take a single signal from a user's equipment and divide the signal into a number of channels for transmission over lines. An inverse demultiplexer at the receiving end then reassembles the data streams into the original single signal. Control for bonding resides in the application of a device, not in the EWSD switch -- Jonathan Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Hello, We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place. Does anyone have a link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together? \ We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb. Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed. I did searches at Cisco on bonding, but could not come up with anything. Thank you. Matt Goodhue Bonding, to be specific, is a layer 1 technique intended for videoconferencing, and is not supported by routers. It's actually BONDING, an acronym for something that escapes me. To do it on the router, look at multilink PPP for a layer 2 solution, and also per-packet and per-flow load balancing at layer 3. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13921t=13914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
