RE: Frame-relay [7:24332]
show your config out Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27302&t=24332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay [7:24332]
do you have more than one frame-relay map statements on each of the spokes? do you have the "broadcast" switch turned on in your map statements? One more thing on frame relay in this kind of scenario. Very often, depending upon the exact topology and routing protocol used, you will find that you cannot use standard ping with any success. Ping by default uses the address of the outgoing interface as it's source address. If you were to set up rudimentary routing, and use, say, a loopback as your source address ( using the extended ping feature ) you would find that your pings are successful. IIRC, the issue is common when using the physical interface on all routers, or when using a multipoint at the hub and p2p on the spokes. HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kenneth Yeung Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 6:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame-relay [7:24332] Based on the frame-relay (Chapter 4 2nd Edition)in Caslow's book: S1 - HQ -S2 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 172.16.1.3 With home lab testing as the above setting, I can ping from HQ to S1 and S2. I cannot ping from S1 and S2 even though I have put in the frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x local DLCI in both S1 and S2. I still got the same debug message "encapsulation fail". Any advice?! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24348&t=24332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-relay [7:24332]
what type of encapsulation you used CISCO , IETF? both routers should be using same encapsulation also try using frame-relay map ip DLCI no broadcast to map the layer 2 to layer 3 regards, suaveguru --- Kenneth Yeung wrote: > Based on the frame-relay (Chapter 4 2nd Edition)in > Caslow's book: > S1 - HQ -S2 > 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 172.16.1.3 > > With home lab testing as the above setting, > I can ping from HQ to S1 and S2. > I cannot ping from S1 and S2 even though I have put > in the frame-relay map > ip x.x.x.x local DLCI in both S1 and S2. > I still got the same debug message "encapsulation > fail". > > Any advice?! [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24343&t=24332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame-relay [7:24332]
Based on the frame-relay (Chapter 4 2nd Edition)in Caslow's book: S1 - HQ -S2 172.16.1.1 172.16.1.2 172.16.1.3 With home lab testing as the above setting, I can ping from HQ to S1 and S2. I cannot ping from S1 and S2 even though I have put in the frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x local DLCI in both S1 and S2. I still got the same debug message "encapsulation fail". Any advice?! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24332&t=24332 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
