HSRP [7:903]

2001-04-17 Thread SH Wesson

There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B.  HSRP is running between these
two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a
priority of 150.  Currently, RTR-A is the active router.  However RTR-B
shows that it's in a state of INIT.  When I do a "show int fa0/0", it
shows that the line is up but the protocol is down.  The configuration
looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface.

Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve 
the
problem to get it out of INIT state.  If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will
not pick up and become active as it stands now.  Any assistance would be
appreciated.

Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=903&t=903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: HSRP [7:903]

2001-04-17 Thread Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU

Wesson,

I have run into this before. I take it that you have the fastethernet
interfaces on auto negotiate. Take them off auto negotiate ie duplex full,
speed 100.

This worked for me before especially running these T code IOSs on the 2600.

Raul
- Original Message -
From: "SH Wesson" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: HSRP [7:903]


> There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B.  HSRP is running between these
> two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a
> priority of 150.  Currently, RTR-A is the active router.  However RTR-B
> shows that it's in a state of INIT.  When I do a "show int fa0/0", it
> shows that the line is up but the protocol is down.  The configuration
> looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface.
>
> Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve
> the
> problem to get it out of INIT state.  If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will
> not pick up and become active as it stands now.  Any assistance would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=905&t=903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: HSRP [7:903]

2001-04-17 Thread Kevin Wigle

Well, I would suppose that the fe interface is sick.  Even if a HSRP router
is in standby it does not disable the port.  Having an up/down condition
suggests a line problem.

As long as the fe is down it won't be able to exchange hellos with the other
HSRP partner.

I would take off HSRP and look at why you have an up/down state on the fe
interface.

Kevin Wigle

- Original Message -
From: "SH Wesson" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: HSRP [7:903]


> There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B.  HSRP is running between these
> two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a
> priority of 150.  Currently, RTR-A is the active router.  However RTR-B
> shows that it's in a state of INIT.  When I do a "show int fa0/0", it
> shows that the line is up but the protocol is down.  The configuration
> looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface.
>
> Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve
> the
> problem to get it out of INIT state.  If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will
> not pick up and become active as it stands now.  Any assistance would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=909&t=903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: HSRP [7:903]

2001-04-17 Thread David Chandler

Sounds like you are implementing too many thing at once.

1.  Before you implement HSRP on the interface you should
verify simple
connectivity. Get rid of the everything on the RTR-B
interface and see 
if it is up & up.  If not than you should look for a simpler
problem 
than HSRP not working correctly.  

2.  Since it is up & down (ethernet) my guess is that you
have a physical 
layer issue.  Possibly a cable issue, or the other end of
the fa int is 
plugged into a 10 Mb hub/switch?

PS: when you do get it into up/up; 
since RTR-B's priority is 150 won't it be the active
interface?  
(assuming that STANDBY PREEMPT is used)

Let us know what you find


DaveC

 

SH Wesson wrote:
> 
> There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B.  HSRP is running between these
> two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a
> priority of 150.  Currently, RTR-A is the active router.  However RTR-B
> shows that it's in a state of INIT.  When I do a "show int fa0/0", it
> shows that the line is up but the protocol is down.  The configuration
> looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface.
> 
> Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve
> the
> problem to get it out of INIT state.  If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will
> not pick up and become active as it stands now.  Any assistance would be
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=908&t=903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: HSRP [7:903]

2001-04-17 Thread Kane, Christopher A.

Router B can't be in standby if it's FA is not up. Are you plugged into a
switch or hub? What does that end look like?

Christopher A. Kane, CCNP



-Original Message-
From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP [7:903]


There are two routers: Rtr-A and Rtr-B.  HSRP is running between these
two groups with RTR-A set with a priority of 100 and RTR-B set with a
priority of 150.  Currently, RTR-A is the active router.  However RTR-B
shows that it's in a state of INIT.  When I do a "show int fa0/0", it
shows that the line is up but the protocol is down.  The configuration
looks fine and HSRP is tracking the serial interface.

Any suggestion as to why RTR-B is not in standby state and how to resolve 
the
problem to get it out of INIT state.  If RTR-A goes down now, RTR-B will
not pick up and become active as it stands now.  Any assistance would be
appreciated.

Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=948&t=903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]