How many tunnels [7:61006]
Hi Group, Does any one know offhand how many simultaneous tunnels a Cisco 3620 can handle (des and 3des)?? I can't find any hard evidence of this information on the cisco site... Thanks, CG ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone + 353 1 4093000 fax + 353 1 4093001 ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61006&t=61006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How many tunnels [7:61006]
Maximum Number of Encrypted Tunnels Up to 100 encrypted tunnel on a 1700, up to 300 tunnels on Cisco 2600, up to 800 for 2650 with AIM-VPN/ EP, up to 800 tunnels for the Cisco 2600XMs, 2691, and 3725, up to 800 tunnels on Cisco 3620 and 3640, and up to 2,000 tunnels on Cisco 3660 and 3745. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/routers/ps274/products_data_sheet09186a0080088750.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61007&t=61006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How many tunnels [7:61006]
At 10:19 AM + 1/14/03, Michael Tan wrote: >Maximum Number of Encrypted Tunnels >Up to 100 encrypted tunnel on a 1700, up to 300 tunnels on Cisco 2600, up to >800 for 2650 with AIM-VPN/ EP, up to 800 tunnels for the Cisco 2600XMs, >2691, and 3725, up to 800 tunnels on Cisco 3620 and 3640, and up to 2,000 >tunnels on Cisco 3660 and 3745. > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/routers/ps274/products_data_sheet09186a0080088750.html > Of course, since tunneling tends to be processor intensive, these numbers are unlikely to be reachable in practice unless the router is running no dynamic routing, access lists, or other CPU intensive tasks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61011&t=61006 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]