Re: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-25 Thread Reza
Take a look at this document.
Hope this helps
Reza


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405c.shtml#topic1





Tim Champion  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
 which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
 lowest or average value for the entire route?

 Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be
 appreciated.


 Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66129t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-25 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Tim Champion wrote:
 
 When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default
 'K' values)
 which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the
 highest,
 lowest or average value for the entire route?

When calculating the composite metric, IGRP and EIGRP use the heaviest load
on any segment in the route. The concern is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't
want a router to select a path that on average has a reasonable load, but
also has one link that is overloaded. This could happen if you used an
average. And you definitely wouldn't want it to choose a path with the
highest load. So they use the lowest load  of any segment, which they pass
to each other in Update packets.

As you probably know, load isn't used at all unless you configure the metric
weights command.

Reliability is similar. It's the worst reliability of any segment in the
path. You wouldn't want a router to select a path that on average had good
reliability, but also had a link in the middle somewhere that was dropping
packets like crazy. As you probably know, by default reliability is not used
unelss you use the metric weights command.

IGRP and EIGRP also use the lowest-bandwidth segment on the route to a
network. The concern, again, is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't want a router
to select a path that had some high-bandwidth links if there was still a
dial-up modem connection somewhere in the path. Each router reports the
bandwidth (which is configurable at router interfaces) in Update packets.
The lowest is selected and passed on.

Delay, on the other hand, is a sum of all the delays for outgoing interfaces
in the path to the network.

Did you already find this paper on IGRP by Rutgers:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/5.html

It doesn't have all the details, but is still a good read.

Priscilla


 
 Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it
 would be
 appreciated.
 
 
 Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66140t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-25 Thread Tim Champion
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
lowest or average value for the entire route?

Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be
appreciated.


Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66181t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-24 Thread Tim Champion
When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
lowest or average value for the entire route?

Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be
appreciated.


Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66062t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-24 Thread Robert Edmonds
Try the following Cisco link on IGRP metrics:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405c.shtml


Tim Champion  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
 which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
 lowest or average value for the entire route?

 Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be
 appreciated.


 Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66067t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-24 Thread Reza
Take a look at this document.
Hope this helps
Reza


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405c.shtml#topic1





Tim Champion  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values)
 which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the highest,
 lowest or average value for the entire route?

 Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it would be
 appreciated.


 Many thanks in advance.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66069t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Tim Champion wrote:
 
 When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default
 'K' values)
 which load and reliability values does one use? Do you use the
 highest,
 lowest or average value for the entire route?

When calculating the composite metric, IGRP and EIGRP use the heaviest load
on any segment in the route. The concern is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't
want a router to select a path that on average has a reasonable load, but
also has one link that is overloaded. This could happen if you used an
average. And you definitely wouldn't want it to choose a path with the
highest load. So they use the lowest load  of any segment, which they pass
to each other in Update packets.

As you probably know, load isn't used at all unless you configure the metric
weights command.

Reliability is similar. It's the worst reliability of any segment in the
path. You wouldn't want a router to select a path that on average had good
reliability, but also had a link in the middle somewhere that was dropping
packets like crazy. As you probably know, by default reliability is not used
unelss you use the metric weights command.

IGRP and EIGRP also use the lowest-bandwidth segment on the route to a
network. The concern, again, is any bottlenecks. You wouldn't want a router
to select a path that had some high-bandwidth links if there was still a
dial-up modem connection somewhere in the path. Each router reports the
bandwidth (which is configurable at router interfaces) in Update packets.
The lowest is selected and passed on.

Delay, on the other hand, is a sum of all the delays for outgoing interfaces
in the path to the network.

Did you already find this paper on IGRP by Rutgers:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/5.html

It doesn't have all the details, but is still a good read.

Priscilla


 
 Also if anyone could point me to a document on the above it
 would be
 appreciated.
 
 
 Many thanks in advance.
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66082t=66062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]