Re: Load balancing with Win2k and Cat6k [7:24494]
Thanks George I'll watch out for that, ""George Murphy CCNP, CCDP"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Just an FYI, last week our server guys at the campus fired up a Win2k > load balancing scenario and it was spewing multicasts like a bat out of > hell and made parts of the network inaccessible, like printers, an ISDN > 128k link, etc. We were using Observer to sniff. Now we have put the > little monsters in there own VLAN. the highway is smooth now with > the HOV lane in operation ;-) > > Jonathan Hays wrote: > > >Patrick Donlon wrote: > > > >>had a look on the CCO, m'soft and HPs site but I can't see much relevant > >>info, can any provide some info or experience on this > >> > > > >Really? I searched www.microsoft.com/technet with the phrase "network > >interface load > >balancing" and came up with quite a few hits discussing load balancing > (e.g., > >"Configuring Network Load Balancing Q240997"). > > > >You may get more help on your problem from a Microsoft newsgroup. It's hard > >to see how > >this is a Cisco ACS problem; it seems more like a Microsoft Windows problem. > > > > > Message Posted at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24680&t=24494 > -- > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Load balancing with Win2k and Cat6k [7:24494]
Thanks George I'll watch out for that, ""George Murphy CCNP, CCDP"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Just an FYI, last week our server guys at the campus fired up a Win2k > load balancing scenario and it was spewing multicasts like a bat out of > hell and made parts of the network inaccessible, like printers, an ISDN > 128k link, etc. We were using Observer to sniff. Now we have put the > little monsters in there own VLAN. the highway is smooth now with > the HOV lane in operation ;-) > > Jonathan Hays wrote: > > >Patrick Donlon wrote: > > > >>had a look on the CCO, m'soft and HPs site but I can't see much relevant > >>info, can any provide some info or experience on this > >> > > > >Really? I searched www.microsoft.com/technet with the phrase "network > >interface load > >balancing" and came up with quite a few hits discussing load balancing > (e.g., > >"Configuring Network Load Balancing Q240997"). > > > >You may get more help on your problem from a Microsoft newsgroup. It's hard > >to see how > >this is a Cisco ACS problem; it seems more like a Microsoft Windows problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24766&t=24494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load balancing with Win2k and Cat6k [7:24494]
Just an FYI, last week our server guys at the campus fired up a Win2k load balancing scenario and it was spewing multicasts like a bat out of hell and made parts of the network inaccessible, like printers, an ISDN 128k link, etc. We were using Observer to sniff. Now we have put the little monsters in there own VLAN. the highway is smooth now with the HOV lane in operation ;-) Jonathan Hays wrote: >Patrick Donlon wrote: > >>had a look on the CCO, m'soft and HPs site but I can't see much relevant >>info, can any provide some info or experience on this >> > >Really? I searched www.microsoft.com/technet with the phrase "network >interface load >balancing" and came up with quite a few hits discussing load balancing (e.g., >"Configuring Network Load Balancing Q240997"). > >You may get more help on your problem from a Microsoft newsgroup. It's hard >to see how >this is a Cisco ACS problem; it seems more like a Microsoft Windows problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24680&t=24494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Load balancing with Win2k and Cat6k [7:24494]
Patrick Donlon wrote: > had a look on the CCO, m'soft and HPs site but I can't see much relevant > info, can any provide some info or experience on this Really? I searched www.microsoft.com/technet with the phrase "network interface load balancing" and came up with quite a few hits discussing load balancing (e.g., "Configuring Network Load Balancing Q240997"). You may get more help on your problem from a Microsoft newsgroup. It's hard to see how this is a Cisco ACS problem; it seems more like a Microsoft Windows problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24673&t=24494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Load balancing with Win2k and Cat6k [7:24494]
Hi everyone I'm trying to setup a ACS server for fault tolerance/load balancing (I'm not sure if they are separate features or work together) connected to two Cat 6Ks. The ACS is a HP netserver and was already set up with two NICs and a virtual interface before I got my hands on it. The nics are connected to separate switches each in the same vlan, with a trunk between the switches. When I plug the two interfaces into the switch only one of the interfaces actually works, any frames sent to the other nic are lost I presume. I've had a look on the CCO, m'soft and HPs site but I can't see much relevant info, can any provide some info or experience on this Cheers Pat Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24494&t=24494 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
