RE: OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-30 Thread Trevor Jennings

Thanks to all those who replied about this question. We ended up just
setting up a server to redirect httpd requests to the new location. Seems
it was alot easier to do that rather than to play around with routing
issues.

Cheers,

 - Trevor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42895&t=42217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-22 Thread Brunner Joseph

This is what I would do in your situation.. -Listing what i have
to do to keep the boss happy and save money for your firm.

1. Keep old IP's at the old datacenter, hitting live servers
at the new datacenter 
2. Prevent the need to a second set of servers with DNS entries
seperate from the originals

My question first - why can't you leave just one server with a "sorry
maintence this weekend" sign up. Its perfectly accetable to allow
say 4 hours downtime. Your boss is probably just being a hardass.
Unless your Yahoo and can't afford any downtime, tell him to chillout,
go back to his boss and be a man.

That being said, I would... 

Get the old router (at the old colo)
to do a gre tunnel to the new router and the new colo. At the new colo
have the default route point to the other end of the tunnel (at the old
colo). The Old colo will be our "ip nat outside", with static
routes for the Servers Private IP's (now at the new colo) via the tunnel
interface.

Now, the new colo, will have NO default route, just a route for the
old colo router, via its normal next hop (probably the new colo's edge
equipment)... All incoming requests will hit the old router, go thru the gre
tunnel, and back out the old router from the servers, after going thru the
tunnel. This should work fine, I did something similar when we blew out of
Exodus one weekend :)


One more gotcha is have your DNS TTL taken as low as you can (say 5 minutes)
so you can just have this stupid thing running for a few hours. I dont think
you can have both at once, unless you can do a policy route for "it goes out
the interface it came in by" so it will be using old colo's and new colo's
ip addresses at once.

You will still have the downtime from the move of the servers.. but
it shouldn't be too much.. if you schedule it right, and have a low TTL in
dns, you can get by, with pulling your servers just when your DNS changes,
buy the time you get to the new site (and your DNS is mostly changed around
the globe, your back up)

Even if you had multiple servers (ones at each colo) you still have to
account for DNS issues.

Bottom line : is a few minutes to hours of downtime, worth buying a new set
of servers.



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42227&t=42217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-22 Thread Marc Thach Xuan Ky

Hi Trevor,
Assuming that your servers have unique public IP addresses and you can
get a small new address space from the colocation provider (for use as a
NAT pool) then this would be technically feasible using twice-NAT. 
However, you would be paying your current colo provider for twice the
bandwidth that you already consume plus your new provider.  You would
add hops, delay, packet loss, and complexity.  If you do not have at
least one spare server (assuming similar platforms) then you will
require downtime whne you move each server anyway, so you could change
the DNS entry then.  Note that you must lower the TTL of DNS entries so
as to let cached records expire in time for the change.  Note also that
if all traffic is web, then you might like to consider HTTP redirection
as a technique in case your current DNS TTLs are already too long.
rgds
Marc

Trevor Jennings wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  Where I work, we have a number of servers being co-located at one
> location and are planning on moving those servers to another co-location
> provider soon. My boss asked me why we could not, when we move the
> servers, just place a router at the original ISP to redirect all traffic
> from the original ip's to the new ip's rather than having duplicate
> servers or adjusting the DNS at the same time. I told him that I wasnt
> sure whether it was possible and was told by a friend that its not
> really possible to do that. Can anyone confirm that or rather explain why
> that is not possible? My Boss's theory was that we would have a router
> with 2 ethernet ports and redirect the original ip's to the new ip's
> through the second ethernet.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>  - Trevor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42223&t=42217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-22 Thread Koen Zeilstra

Maybe you can put a router running NAT to hide the new addresses behind
the old ones.

K.

Koen Zeilstra
Legian
---
You know you're a little fat if you have stretch marks on your car.
-- Cyrus, Chicago Reader 1/22/82

On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Trevor Jennings wrote:

| Hello,
|
|  Where I work, we have a number of servers being co-located at one
| location and are planning on moving those servers to another co-location
| provider soon. My boss asked me why we could not, when we move the
| servers, just place a router at the original ISP to redirect all traffic
| from the original ip's to the new ip's rather than having duplicate
| servers or adjusting the DNS at the same time. I told him that I wasnt
| sure whether it was possible and was told by a friend that its not
| really possible to do that. Can anyone confirm that or rather explain why
| that is not possible? My Boss's theory was that we would have a router
| with 2 ethernet ports and redirect the original ip's to the new ip's
| through the second ethernet.
|
| Cheers,
|
|  - Trevor
|
|
|
|
|




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4&t=42217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-22 Thread Trevor Jennings

Hello,

 Where I work, we have a number of servers being co-located at one
location and are planning on moving those servers to another co-location
provider soon. My boss asked me why we could not, when we move the
servers, just place a router at the original ISP to redirect all traffic
from the original ip's to the new ip's rather than having duplicate
servers or adjusting the DNS at the same time. I told him that I wasnt
sure whether it was possible and was told by a friend that its not
really possible to do that. Can anyone confirm that or rather explain why
that is not possible? My Boss's theory was that we would have a router
with 2 ethernet ports and redirect the original ip's to the new ip's
through the second ethernet. 

Cheers,

 - Trevor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42217&t=42217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]