Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
Not only am I from CA, I'm from Oakland. But I don't actually think the game was unfair; I just like griping . I root for any team whose town I live in (the Warriors excepted) Has anyone read the recent article in Network Computing mag on Windows technology in Cisco gear? (http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303colshipley.html). My God, stupidity and cupidity will never cease. It certainly would make me want to re-think migrating my voice system to VoIP on any platform that does this. I've already fired off an e-mail to the author asking about which platforms other than Cisco are adopting this. Must research further... And just to keep this on-topic, I'm starting my CCNP in a couple of weeks... Steven A. Ridder 02/04/2002 1:18:21 PM Another person from CA, eh? The call was by the rule book, even if the rule may have been unfair as some people have claimed. We had that exect call go against us in week 2 of a Jets game and we never cried. We even lost that game. It's a legitimate rule. AND, the Raiders still could have stopped us before getting to kick the FG that put it into overtime. Then in overtime, the Raiders still didn't stop us. So it wasn't like the refs just handed us the game. There still were some major playing and feats that we had to make to get us to where we got in that game. Steve Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message about Port Address Translation! :-D Next time please spell out the team name. Or pick another team! The Raiders were robbed, robbed, I say! Steven A. Ridder 02/03/2002 8:48:08 PM PATRIOTS! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34392t=34392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
After reading the article, the author didn't give any evidence to support his claim that Cisco is using Microsoft code... If he's right, I am certainly interested to know what platforms are using MS code. - Sean -Original Message- From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392] Not only am I from CA, I'm from Oakland. But I don't actually think the game was unfair; I just like griping . I root for any team whose town I live in (the Warriors excepted) Has anyone read the recent article in Network Computing mag on Windows technology in Cisco gear? (http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303colshipley.html). My God, stupidity and cupidity will never cease. It certainly would make me want to re-think migrating my voice system to VoIP on any platform that does this. I've already fired off an e-mail to the author asking about which platforms other than Cisco are adopting this. Must research further... And just to keep this on-topic, I'm starting my CCNP in a couple of weeks... Steven A. Ridder 02/04/2002 1:18:21 PM Another person from CA, eh? The call was by the rule book, even if the rule may have been unfair as some people have claimed. We had that exect call go against us in week 2 of a Jets game and we never cried. We even lost that game. It's a legitimate rule. AND, the Raiders still could have stopped us before getting to kick the FG that put it into overtime. Then in overtime, the Raiders still didn't stop us. So it wasn't like the refs just handed us the game. There still were some major playing and feats that we had to make to get us to where we got in that game. Steve Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message about Port Address Translation! :-D Next time please spell out the team name. Or pick another team! The Raiders were robbed, robbed, I say! Steven A. Ridder 02/03/2002 8:48:08 PM PATRIOTS! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34397t=34392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
they are refering to the: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ga/voicega/7750/ it is callmanager on a blade.. After reading the article, the author didn't give any evidence to support his claim that Cisco is using Microsoft code... If he's right, I am certainly interested to know what platforms are using MS code. - Sean -Original Message- From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392] Not only am I from CA, I'm from Oakland. But I don't actually think the game was unfair; I just like griping . I root for any team whose town I live in (the Warriors excepted) Has anyone read the recent article in Network Computing mag on Windows technology in Cisco gear? (http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303colshipley.html). My God, stupidity and cupidity will never cease. It certainly would make me want to re-think migrating my voice system to VoIP on any platform that does this. I've already fired off an e-mail to the author asking about which platforms other than Cisco are adopting this. Must research further... And just to keep this on-topic, I'm starting my CCNP in a couple of weeks... Steven A. Ridder 02/04/2002 1:18:21 PM Another person from CA, eh? The call was by the rule book, even if the rule may have been unfair as some people have claimed. We had that exect call go against us in week 2 of a Jets game and we never cried. We even lost that game. It's a legitimate rule. AND, the Raiders still could have stopped us before getting to kick the FG that put it into overtime. Then in overtime, the Raiders still didn't stop us. So it wasn't like the refs just handed us the game. There still were some major playing and feats that we had to make to get us to where we got in that game. Steve Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message about Port Address Translation! :-D Next time please spell out the team name. Or pick another team! The Raiders were robbed, robbed, I say! Steven A. Ridder 02/03/2002 8:48:08 PM PATRIOTS! [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34402t=34392 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
my quick read is the concern that Unity and Call Manager run on the Windows
NT platform only. Whether those are stand alone servers or blades in various
convergence boxes.
so yes, there is reason to be concerned.
Chuck
Sean Knox wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
After reading the article, the author didn't give any evidence to support
his claim that Cisco is using Microsoft code... If he's right, I am
certainly interested to know what platforms are using MS code.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
Not only am I from CA, I'm from Oakland. But I don't actually think the
game was unfair; I just like griping . I root for any team whose town I
live in (the Warriors excepted)
Has anyone read the recent article in Network Computing mag on Windows
technology in Cisco gear?
(http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303colshipley.html). My God,
stupidity and cupidity will never cease. It certainly would make me want
to
re-think migrating my voice system to VoIP on any platform that does this.
I've already fired off an e-mail to the author asking about which
platforms
other than Cisco are adopting this. Must research further...
And just to keep this on-topic, I'm starting my CCNP in a couple of
weeks...
Steven A. Ridder 02/04/2002 1:18:21 PM
Another person from CA, eh? The call was by the rule book, even if the
rule
may have been unfair as some people have claimed. We had that exect call
go
against us in week 2 of a Jets game and we never cried. We even lost that
game. It's a legitimate rule. AND, the Raiders still could have stopped
us
before getting to kick the FG that put it into overtime. Then in overtime,
the Raiders still didn't stop us. So it wasn't like the refs just handed
us
the game. There still were some major playing and feats that we had to
make
to get us to where we got in that game.
Steve
Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message about Port
Address Translation! :-D
Next time please spell out the team name. Or pick another team! The
Raiders were robbed, robbed, I say!
Steven A. Ridder 02/03/2002 8:48:08 PM
PATRIOTS!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34409t=34392
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
