Johnny McKenzie wrote:
Just finished my BCRAN ( 3 down, 1 to go ) with a good mark ( 897) but was
a
bit disturbed by some of the questions, at least three questions of the
select
from the list of command types were totally obvious, keeping the NDA in
mind,
one question specified an IP address, and in the list of commands that IP
address was listed *once*. Totally self evident, about 4 other quite
obvioius
answers in that list as well regarding DLCI numbers and dialer-maps, the
number specified in the question only appears once in the list of commands
Looks like you could grab a guy of the street and they would get 500 by
deduction and guessing.
While I like the list of commands, as I'm a very poor rote learner and
have a
hell of a time remebering where the hypens go, as well as I speak English
rather than Amerish, ( Neighbour gives you no marks in the exam, but as I
never type the whole command in the CLI, you tend to default to what they
taught you in school ). But I do feel it is critical that the command list
be
extended so there is 3 or 4 possible options for any given value. ( yes, I
did
leave comments in the exam )
What did I get wrong ? The stuff I didn't study, what models have what
capabilites ( Like I'm going to spec up an install without checking the
website ) and the 700 series ( I just ignored it, no use confusing yourself
with another command line for 5 or 6 marks and I've never encountered one
yet
)
So onto the home straight.CIT and I'm a CCNP
I also share your feeling. Took this test today, and frankly speaking,
I didn't feel that I'm deserved to have a pass (missed many questions in
async/PPP, ISDN protocols), however, because of this easy way to guess a
command, I barely passed with 819.
for me, 2 more to go (switching, CIT) to the CCNP.
Regards,
c.h.Ip
ps. any readers in Hong Kong? need study parthers ;-)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27314t=27227
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
