Dear all, I have a question about reading Jeff Doyle book. I am studying EIGRP. At page 354, last paragraph. It said: "Note that Langley was the only feasible successor to subnet 10.1.7.0 because Chanute's locally calculated metric is higher than Wright FD (1024 > 768)" I have performed a calculation for every step of this example. At that stage, Chanute locally calculated metric to 10.1.7.0 should be (1 + 4) * 256 = 1280. And therefore, Chanute should advertise a distance of 1280 to Wright. So, the last statement of the above paragraph should be "(1280 > 768)", not "(1024 > 768)". Well, it does not affect the whole example, just want to know if my calculation is right or not.... or if it is a "bug" of the book. Thanks. _________________________________ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
