Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
3524 .try it. Ouellette, Tim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40877t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
Tim, I've had a similar problem in the past between a 5500 and 6509. It was a bad blade in the 5500. R/ Dave On 4/8/02 10:54 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ouellette, Tim wrote: Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40879t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
Tim, This should do it for you http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html It appears that you didn't disable trunk negotiation on the 6500. Since the 3500XL doesn't support DTP you are having trouble. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of yangchun Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876] 3524 .try it. Ouellette, Tim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40884t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
You cant use dtp with 3524, use the set trunk */* nonegoitate dot1q to force it to trunk... Also make sure you enble on the ge 0/1 on the 3524 as a switch port mode trunk with dot1q encapsulation That will force it to trunk, and life will be sweet. We use Dual 6509's with 10 3548XLs and its working fine. Cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40887t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
usmdlz1329000101 (enable) sh trunk 7/2 * - indicates vtp domain mismatch Port Mode Encapsulation StatusNative vlan --- - --- 7/2 on dot1q not-trunking 1 Port Vlans allowed on trunk 7/2 1,224-227,1001-1005,1025-4094 Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain 7/2 1 Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned 7/2 usmdlz1329000101 (enable) clear trunk 7/2 2-223,228-1000 set trunk 7/2 on dot1q 1,224-227,1001-1005,1025-4094 Is the on mode okay? Tim -Original Message- From: David C Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876] Tim, This should do it for you http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html It appears that you didn't disable trunk negotiation on the 6500. Since the 3500XL doesn't support DTP you are having trouble. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of yangchun Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876] 3524 .try it. Ouellette, Tim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40891t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
