Re: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
Actually, Nabil, that is not true at all. The conduit command is not going anywhere anytime soon. The push is towards an interface based acl list, which is easier done with the access lists rather than the conduit commands. ""Nabil Fares"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. HTH Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command compare with access-list/access-group command in PIX?. I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future realease. Is it True??. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
Hi, Thanks for the info. Is there any documents that i can refer to?. Would the PIX still maintain the stateful capabilities without the conduit command?. Thanks. "Nabil Fares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 15-02-2001 11:39:59 PM To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. HTH Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command compare with access-list/access-group command in PIX?. I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future realease. Is it True??. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
When did 5.3(1) come out? I must have overlooked it recently, or it's brand new. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""Jason"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 96ii82$nra$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:96ii82$nra$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 5.2(4) is rather new (last 2 weeks or so), and still supports static > conduits. > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ > > > ""Nabil Fares"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for > > backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with > > access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. > > > > > > HTH > > > > Nabil > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command > > > > > > Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command > > compare with > > access-list/access-group command in PIX?. > > > > I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future > > realease. Is it True??. > > > > Thanks. > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
5.2(4) is rather new (last 2 weeks or so), and still supports static conduits. -- Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ ""Nabil Fares"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for > backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with > access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. > > > HTH > > Nabil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command > > > Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command > compare with > access-list/access-group command in PIX?. > > I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future > realease. Is it True??. > > Thanks. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command
That's true, conduits are going away. The only reason you see them is for backward compatibility issues. Definitely use static commands with access-lists. Its a two-step process, but its a nice feature. HTH Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco PIX : Static and Conduit command Does anybody know about the advantage of having static conduit command compare with access-list/access-group command in PIX?. I heard that the static conduit will no longer available in the future realease. Is it True??. Thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
