RE: GNS replies from furthest server

2000-12-13 Thread Joseph Ezerski

Not that I am any sort of expert in Novell, but have you checked the
encapsulation type of the local server and the clients to see if it matches?
Also, is the external IPX network number the same.  And, as someone else
mentioned, try and set a preferred server in your client software.

Just my 2 cents.

Joseph

-Original Message-
From: Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 4:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GNS replies from furthest server


Shaun,

Can you provide us an example of the 4908 configs?  The problem may be in
the IRB configuration, or in SAP spoofing (sometimes the router will respond
to GNS faster than the local servers).

Scott
"Shaun Wakelen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Can anybody shed some light on this problem. We have installed a gigabit
 network using 3548's and 4908's. Two 3548's have Novell servers (NetWare
4)
 connected to them, and also have links to WAN routers. These are connected
 to two 4908's running IRB and HSRP. To the 4908's are four further 3548's
to
 which the Novell clients are attached. The problem is, when a client
starts
 up, the GNS request is being replied to by a server on the other side of
the
 WAN link, and not a local one. If the remote server is disconnected then a
 different remote server replies. The IPX routing table shows the local
 servers with the lowest hop count and metric. This was originally an ATM
 network, which works perfectly.

 I now have several bumps where I have been hitting my head against a brick
 wall!

 Any ideas

 Thanking you in advance
 Shaun Wakelen
 This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential
and/or
 copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee.
If
 you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
do
 not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
 store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
 does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus
K-NET
 Ltd and you.

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GNS replies from furthest server

2000-12-12 Thread Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE

Shaun,

Can you provide us an example of the 4908 configs?  The problem may be in
the IRB configuration, or in SAP spoofing (sometimes the router will respond
to GNS faster than the local servers).

Scott
"Shaun Wakelen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Can anybody shed some light on this problem. We have installed a gigabit
 network using 3548's and 4908's. Two 3548's have Novell servers (NetWare
4)
 connected to them, and also have links to WAN routers. These are connected
 to two 4908's running IRB and HSRP. To the 4908's are four further 3548's
to
 which the Novell clients are attached. The problem is, when a client
starts
 up, the GNS request is being replied to by a server on the other side of
the
 WAN link, and not a local one. If the remote server is disconnected then a
 different remote server replies. The IPX routing table shows the local
 servers with the lowest hop count and metric. This was originally an ATM
 network, which works perfectly.

 I now have several bumps where I have been hitting my head against a brick
 wall!

 Any ideas

 Thanking you in advance
 Shaun Wakelen
 This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential
and/or
 copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee.
If
 you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
do
 not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
 store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
 does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus
K-NET
 Ltd and you.

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: GNS replies from furthest server

2000-12-12 Thread Frank Wells

Make sure you have Portfast enabled on the local server switch ports.


From: Shaun Wakelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Shaun Wakelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GNS replies from furthest server
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:29:02 -

Can anybody shed some light on this problem. We have installed a gigabit
network using 3548's and 4908's. Two 3548's have Novell servers (NetWare 4)
connected to them, and also have links to WAN routers. These are connected
to two 4908's running IRB and HSRP. To the 4908's are four further 3548's 
to
which the Novell clients are attached. The problem is, when a client starts
up, the GNS request is being replied to by a server on the other side of 
the
WAN link, and not a local one. If the remote server is disconnected then a
different remote server replies. The IPX routing table shows the local
servers with the lowest hop count and metric. This was originally an ATM
network, which works perfectly.

I now have several bumps where I have been hitting my head against a brick
wall!

Any ideas

Thanking you in advance
Shaun Wakelen
This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential and/or
copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee. If
you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and 
do
not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus K-NET
Ltd and you.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GNS replies from furthest server

2000-12-12 Thread Greene, Patrick

Why don't you just put a PREFERRED SERVER statement on the Netware Client?
That will take care of it.

Patrick

-Original Message-
From: Shaun Wakelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GNS replies from furthest server


Can anybody shed some light on this problem. We have installed a gigabit
network using 3548's and 4908's. Two 3548's have Novell servers (NetWare 4)
connected to them, and also have links to WAN routers. These are connected
to two 4908's running IRB and HSRP. To the 4908's are four further 3548's to
which the Novell clients are attached. The problem is, when a client starts
up, the GNS request is being replied to by a server on the other side of the
WAN link, and not a local one. If the remote server is disconnected then a
different remote server replies. The IPX routing table shows the local
servers with the lowest hop count and metric. This was originally an ATM
network, which works perfectly. 

I now have several bumps where I have been hitting my head against a brick
wall!

Any ideas

Thanking you in advance
Shaun Wakelen
This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential and/or
copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee. If
you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do
not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus K-NET
Ltd and you.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: GNS replies from furthest server

2000-12-12 Thread Shaun Wakelen

Certainly can. Here are the 4908 configs.

Regards
Shaun Wakelen


-Original Message-
From: Scott McClure, CCNP, CCDA, MCNE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2000 12:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GNS replies from furthest server


Shaun,

Can you provide us an example of the 4908 configs?  The problem may be in
the IRB configuration, or in SAP spoofing (sometimes the router will respond
to GNS faster than the local servers).

Scott
"Shaun Wakelen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Can anybody shed some light on this problem. We have installed a gigabit
 network using 3548's and 4908's. Two 3548's have Novell servers (NetWare
4)
 connected to them, and also have links to WAN routers. These are connected
 to two 4908's running IRB and HSRP. To the 4908's are four further 3548's
to
 which the Novell clients are attached. The problem is, when a client
starts
 up, the GNS request is being replied to by a server on the other side of
the
 WAN link, and not a local one. If the remote server is disconnected then a
 different remote server replies. The IPX routing table shows the local
 servers with the lowest hop count and metric. This was originally an ATM
 network, which works perfectly.

 I now have several bumps where I have been hitting my head against a brick
 wall!

 Any ideas

 Thanking you in advance
 Shaun Wakelen
 This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential
and/or
 copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee.
If
 you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
do
 not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
 store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
 does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus
K-NET
 Ltd and you.

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged, confidential and/or
copyright information and is for the sole use of the intended addressee. If
you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do
not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or
store or copy the information in any medium.This message is subject to and
does not create or vary any contractual relationship between Telindus K-NET
Ltd and you.



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]