RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]
JP, Your not going to be able to ping 10.20.1.104. 10.20.1.104 is not an interfaces IP address, it's the network that interface Serial 0.1 is on. You would need to ping one of the interfaces IP address's. (10.20.1.105-106). JF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11269&t=11266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]
Jeongwoo, I'll only make one suggestion in saying with the /30 mask what exactly are you pinging when you ping 10.20.1.140...Is that a valid host or the network.. :-> I'd recommend trying to ping 105/106 HTH Nigel.. - Original Message - From: Jeongwoo Park To: Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] > Hi all > To make myself clearer, I put output of "sh ip route connected" > What I asked previously was that I was not able to ping 10.20.1.104 that is > said to be directly connected, Serial 0.1 > I was wondering what ip address it would be > > WAMS>sh ip ro c > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 49 subnets, 3 masks > C 172.16.111.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 61 subnets, 3 masks > C 10.20.1.104/30 is directly connected, Serial0.1 > > Thanks all > > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11271&t=11266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]
That's what I couldn't figure out. I think 10.20.1.104 must be host ip address, not network address. Am I understanding wrong? Like you recommended, I was able to ping 10.20.1.105 and 10.20.1.106. But how did you know that it was 105 or 106 instead of 102 or 103? JP -Original Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:36 PM To: Jeongwoo Park; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] Jeongwoo, I'll only make one suggestion in saying with the /30 mask what exactly are you pinging when you ping 10.20.1.140...Is that a valid host or the network.. :-> I'd recommend trying to ping 105/106 HTH Nigel.. - Original Message - From: Jeongwoo Park To: Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] > Hi all > To make myself clearer, I put output of "sh ip route connected" > What I asked previously was that I was not able to ping 10.20.1.104 that is > said to be directly connected, Serial 0.1 > I was wondering what ip address it would be > > WAMS>sh ip ro c > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 49 subnets, 3 masks > C 172.16.111.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 61 subnets, 3 masks > C 10.20.1.104/30 is directly connected, Serial0.1 > > Thanks all > > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11272&t=11266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]
The IP address / mask combination would tell you. Since the address/mask was 10.20.1.104/30, you know that this is not a valid host because a network with a /30 mask always begins on a number that is a multiple of 4. The /30 indicates that there are 2 valid hosts, 10.20.1.105 or 10.20.1.106, 10.20.1.104 identifies the network (a multiple of 4), and 10.20.1.107 is the broadcast address. So the next available network is 10.20.1.108 and if it has a /30 mask also the valid hosts are 10.20.1.109 and 10.20.1.110, with 10.20.1.111 as the broadcast address. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: Jeongwoo Park To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/7/01 6:31 PM Subject: RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] That's what I couldn't figure out. I think 10.20.1.104 must be host ip address, not network address. Am I understanding wrong? Like you recommended, I was able to ping 10.20.1.105 and 10.20.1.106. But how did you know that it was 105 or 106 instead of 102 or 103? JP -Original Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:36 PM To: Jeongwoo Park; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] Jeongwoo, I'll only make one suggestion in saying with the /30 mask what exactly are you pinging when you ping 10.20.1.140...Is that a valid host or the network.. :-> I'd recommend trying to ping 105/106 HTH Nigel.. - Original Message - From: Jeongwoo Park To: Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] > Hi all > To make myself clearer, I put output of "sh ip route connected" > What I asked previously was that I was not able to ping 10.20.1.104 that is > said to be directly connected, Serial 0.1 > I was wondering what ip address it would be > > WAMS>sh ip ro c > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 49 subnets, 3 masks > C 172.16.111.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 61 subnets, 3 masks > C 10.20.1.104/30 is directly connected, Serial0.1 > > Thanks all > > JP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11279&t=11266 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]