Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Thanx Brian, I have not experienced such a problem now as per my experience.Yesh it could be in the old version but i have never seen it on cisco site regarding this. Thanx once again for replying. Regards, Munit Brian wrote: > well, although its been a few years since I touched frame relay, my memory > was that if I let the cisco autodiscover frame relay mappings, traffic > flowed through it more slowly than if I did a static frame relay map. Its > been a few years, this was 11.2 days, so take it with a grain of salt if > auto discovery has improved. > > Bri > > - Original Message - > From: "Munit Singla" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:06 PM > Subject: Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282] > > > Hi Brian, > > I agree with all your comments but can you little bit elborate on this > > part,Traffic > > passes faster in such a case. > > Regards, > > Munit > > > > Brian wrote: > > > > > True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes > > > traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers > > > connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. > > > > > > Bri > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: > > > > > > > Always ... Always > > > > > > > > get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. > > > > > > > > I have never seen any WAN where the customer did > > > > not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59356&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
well, although its been a few years since I touched frame relay, my memory was that if I let the cisco autodiscover frame relay mappings, traffic flowed through it more slowly than if I did a static frame relay map. Its been a few years, this was 11.2 days, so take it with a grain of salt if auto discovery has improved. Bri - Original Message - From: "Munit Singla" To: Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282] > Hi Brian, > I agree with all your comments but can you little bit elborate on this > part,Traffic > passes faster in such a case. > Regards, > Munit > > Brian wrote: > > > True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes > > traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers > > connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. > > > > Bri > > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: > > > > > Always ... Always > > > > > > get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. > > > > > > I have never seen any WAN where the customer did > > > not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59333&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Hi Brian, I agree with all your comments but can you little bit elborate on this part,Traffic passes faster in such a case. Regards, Munit Brian wrote: > True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes > traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers > connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. > > Bri > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: > > > Always ... Always > > > > get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. > > > > I have never seen any WAN where the customer did > > not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59325&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Thanx for the inf. Regards, Munit test test wrote: > Always ... Always > > get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. > > I have never seen any WAN where the customer did > not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59323&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. Bri On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: > Always ... Always > > get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. > > I have never seen any WAN where the customer did > not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59321&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Always ... Always get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. I have never seen any WAN where the customer did not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59319&t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
