Thanks....Re: [RE: Too many broadcasts [7:453]

2001-05-03 Thread Infotech

"Chuck Larrieu"  wrote:

Broadcasts are not necessarily bad.

How do you suppose ARP works? Not to mention all the things that make life
under windows so enjoyable? Such as network browsing?

Do not be so hasty. Understand first.

How many servers? How many pc's? all on one flat network? No VLANs or
inter-vlan routing?


Chuck
Once worked in a brokerage firm where during market hours 90% of my traffic
was broadcast - and a good thing, too!

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Infotech
Sent:   Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Too many broadcasts [7:453]

Dear Group,

I have a small query:

Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3
catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers
4.0
with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that
many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of
response
delay in my network.
can I use the command:

switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0%

Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to
server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in
my
network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports...

many thanks in advance
HP




Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3022&t=453
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Too many broadcasts [7:453]

2001-04-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 01:16 AM 4/13/01, Infotech wrote:
>Dear Group,
>
>I have a small query:
>
>Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3
>catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers
>4.0
>with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that
>many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of
response
>delay in my network.
>can I use the command:
>
>switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0%

Setting the threshold to zero would be a misuse of the Cisco broadcast 
suppression feature. I'm not sure Cisco even lets you set it to zero? It 
would also cause network problems since you need broadcasts for such 
important functions as dynamic address assignment, address and name 
resolution, service location, and service advertisement. ARP, DHCP, Cisco 
Discovery Protocol, RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, IGMP, and NetBIOS are some of the 
many protocols that make use of broadcasts and multicasts.

The goal of the broadcast suppression feature is to prevent broadcast 
storms, not broadcasts in general. A broadcast storm occurs when bugs in a 
protocol-stack implementation or in a network configuration cause a station 
to send hundreds or thousands of broadcasts per second. In the worst case, 
the broadcasts from one station result in other stations also sending 
broadcasts, much like a storm that builds upon itself.

Broadcasts can cause problems because they interrupt every device in the 
broadcast domain, causing a CPU interrupt and requiring processing. On slow 
CPUs, broadcast storms can be a serious problem. Broadcast storms can wreak 
havoc on 100-Mbps Ethernet LANs with slow computers, because misbehaving 
devices have an opportunity to send broadcasts really quickly at 100 Mbps.

You can configure broadcast suppression on a switch port to keep excessive 
broadcasts from causing performance degradation on devices or LANs 
reachable from that port. Cisco implements broadcast suppression in 
software or hardware, depending on the switch platform. Software broadcast 
suppression uses a packet-based method. Hardware broadcast suppression uses 
a bandwidth-based method.

When a packet-based method is used to measure broadcast activity, the 
threshold parameter is the number of broadcast or multicast packets 
received over a one-second time period. When a bandwidth-based method is 
used, the threshold parameter is the percentage of total available 
bandwidth used by broadcasts or multicasts. In either case, if the 
threshold is reached, the switch port cuts off broadcast and multicast 
packets for the rest of that second. Because packet sizes vary, 
bandwidth-based measurement is more accurate and more effective than 
packet-based measurement.

As Howard often points out, broadcast packets are usually short and don't 
use much bandwidth. In addition, most normal applications don't broadcast 
thousands of times in a second. (For a station to use up most of 100 Mbps 
with 64-byte packets, it would need to send approximately 200,000 times per 
second, which is obviously abnormal.) So, when broadcasts start to use a 
lot of your available bandwidth in a one-second interval, this probably 
indicates a serious problem.

So, to make a long story short, a proper setting for the threshold 
parameter would probably be more like 75%. The value depends on your actual 
applications and traffic types.

Priscilla



>Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to
>server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in
>my
>network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports...
>
>many thanks in advance
>HP
>
>
>
>
>Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=510&t=453
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Too many broadcasts [7:453]

2001-04-12 Thread Dennis R

U, no, it's not advisable to disable broadcasts if you want ARP to work. 
ARP not working would cause rather severe problems. :-)

doctorcisco


>From: "Infotech" 
>Reply-To: "Infotech" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Too many broadcasts [7:453]
>Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 01:16:44 -0400
>
>Dear Group,
>
>I have a small query:
>
>Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3
>catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers
>4.0
>with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that
>many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of 
>response
>delay in my network.
>can I use the command:
>
>switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0%
>
>Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to
>server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in
>my
>network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports...
>
>many thanks in advance
>HP
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=464&t=453
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Too many broadcasts [7:453]

2001-04-12 Thread Chuck Larrieu

Broadcasts are not necessarily bad.

How do you suppose ARP works? Not to mention all the things that make life
under windows so enjoyable? Such as network browsing?

Do not be so hasty. Understand first.

How many servers? How many pc's? all on one flat network? No VLANs or
inter-vlan routing?


Chuck
Once worked in a brokerage firm where during market hours 90% of my traffic
was broadcast - and a good thing, too!

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Infotech
Sent:   Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Too many broadcasts [7:453]

Dear Group,

I have a small query:

Is it advisable to disable broadcast on all the ports of switches. I have 3
catalyst series 6509/5500/5505 in my network running all the WINNT servers
4.0
with all win98/win95 as clients. With the help of CWSI I have observed that
many a times the broadcast increases very much & I experience lot of
response
delay in my network.
can I use the command:

switch> (enable)# set port broadcast 0%

Will this put any impact on my network like nodes won't be able to talk to
server or problem in finding the servers. I have also created VLAN's in
my
network to limit the broadcasts. Should I doit on all the ports...

many thanks in advance
HP




Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=455&t=453
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]