RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
When studying for the CCIE with friends, we decided that if you forget the "broadcast" keyword, the terrorists win. --T Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62754&t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Hi , I think the problem with routing issue as metioned by priscilla also and others. Either there is no route entry here i mean no static route to remote network if u are using static routing. and if dynamic u need to enter brodacst key word. and do check ur route -table like example in route table entry should be like this routing table: destination newtowork metric (static or dynamic) This next hop address is mapped to your dlci and it should be otherwise Encapsulation failed error always comes in multipoint interface confguration. as when u are sending packet to remote network at layer 3 the the next hop address is looked first to reach remote network and then at layer 2 after seeing the frame-relay mapping the frame-relay packet is addressed with the dlci number Same error will also come when u remove your mapping and then check by pinging remote peer. Hope this clears if not then write in detail Regards, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > Dain Deutschman wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides > > internet access > > to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote > > peer...however, no > > other access to anywhere... > > How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are > you running a routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What > does show ip route display? > > If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts, > don't forget to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement. > > Priscilla > > > further more...the encapsulation is > > failing on > > debug outputshere is the output... > > > > sh frame pvc > > > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) > > > > Active Inactive Deleted Static > > Local 1000 > > Switched 0000 > > Unused 0000 > > > > DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE > > = Serial0 > > > > input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes > > 288952 > > out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN > > pkts 0 > > in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN > > pkts 0 > > in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > > out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 > > 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > > pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed > > 00:03:08 > > > > sh frame map > > > > Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, > > IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active > > > > deb ip packet > > > > 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len > 84, > > rcvd > > 3 > > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, > > sending > > > > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, > > encapsu > > lation failed > > > > Basic Encap Settings > > > > encapsulation frame-relay ietf > > > > frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf > > > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > > > Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening > > would be > > greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! > > > > -- > > Dain Deutschman > > CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA > > Data Communications Manager > > New Star Sales and Service, Inc. > > 800.261.0475 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62626&t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Dain Deutschman wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides > internet access > to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote > peer...however, no > other access to anywhere... How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are you running a routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What does show ip route display? If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts, don't forget to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement. Priscilla > further more...the encapsulation is > failing on > debug outputshere is the output... > > sh frame pvc > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) > > Active Inactive Deleted Static > Local 1000 > Switched 0000 > Unused 0000 > > DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE > = Serial0 > > input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes > 288952 > out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN > pkts 0 > in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN > pkts 0 > in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 > 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed > 00:03:08 > > sh frame map > > Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, > IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active > > deb ip packet > > 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, > rcvd > 3 > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, > sending > > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, > encapsu > lation failed > > Basic Encap Settings > > encapsulation frame-relay ietf > > frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening > would be > greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! > > -- > Dain Deutschman > CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA > Data Communications Manager > New Star Sales and Service, Inc. > 800.261.0475 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62623&t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Dain, another day I had the same problem... In my case I was using a static route like this: ip route x.x.x.x mask serial0/1 when I changed to ip route x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y I got to solve the problem... You can try... Pedro A. do Valle Manaus - AM - Brazil 55 92 614 3105 - Original Message - From: Dain Deutschman To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614] > Hello, > > I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access > to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no > other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on > debug outputshere is the output... > > sh frame pvc > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) > > Active Inactive Deleted Static > Local 1000 > Switched 0000 > Unused 0000 > > DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 > > input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes 288952 > out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 > in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 > in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 > 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08 > > sh frame map > > Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, > IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active > > deb ip packet > > 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd > 3 > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending > > 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu > lation failed > > Basic Encap Settings > > encapsulation frame-relay ietf > > frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be > greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! > > -- > Dain Deutschman > CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA > Data Communications Manager > New Star Sales and Service, Inc. > 800.261.0475 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62620&t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
