RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Yes, the recommended WAN utilization should not exceed 70% (on average, I think). Are you doing CCDA soon - because this is more of CCDA stuff? Well, I am doing it in about 2 weeks time, and if you have any experience or ideas, please, let me know. It seems to be a feared exam! Anyway, WAN utilization is less than 70%, as is Token Ring/FDDI! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49106&t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit itself? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Abu Mwalie Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105] Yes, the recommended WAN utilization should not exceed 70% (on average, I think). Are you doing CCDA soon - because this is more of CCDA stuff? Well, I am doing it in about 2 weeks time, and if you have any experience or ideas, please, let me know. It seems to be a feared exam! Anyway, WAN utilization is less than 70%, as is Token Ring/FDDI! Confidential e-mail for addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy the original communication. 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49112&t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
I don't think it's a limitation so much as a guideline. And this guideline applies to the circuit, not the router hardware. There are other criteria used to judge if the router needs to be beefed up, like looking at CPU load, memory, etc. Mike W. "Jeffrey Reed" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit itself? > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > Cell 717-805-5536 > Office 717-737-8586 > FAX 717-737-0290 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49116&t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
Michael L. Williams wrote: > > I don't think it's a limitation so much as a guideline. Yes. The 70% average utilization threshold for WANs is just a guideline. I'm the one who introduced it to Cisco documentation when I put it in the Designing Cisco Networks course! ;-) And I got it from the guideline we used when I did network consulting for Network General (now Network Associates). The reason we chose 70% was just to make sure that most traffic could still get through even if there were bursts. It's 70% in a 10-minute window, by the way. Utilization stats only make sense, by the way, if you include a timeframe. Take baseball for example. We can all think of someone who has a really high batting average for this season or maybe just for this week, but their average for the last few years or their lifetime average sucks. (Maybe steroids have something to do with that. ;-) > And > this guideline > applies to the circuit, not the router hardware. There are > other criteria > used to judge if the router needs to be beefed up, like looking > at CPU load, > memory, etc. Indeed. Good points. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com > > Mike W. > > "Jeffrey Reed" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Is the limitation in the router hardware or the WAN circuit > itself? > > > > > > Jeffrey Reed > > Classic Networking, Inc. > > Cell 717-805-5536 > > Office 717-737-8586 > > FAX 717-737-0290 > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49146&t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WAN utilisation [7:49105]
yes u are right is 70 %birdy wrote: > > Hi > > Does cisco recommends that if the WAN utilisation is above 70 % > ,it will > cause performance degradation ? I think i have read it > somewhere in one of > the ciscopress book. Can someone out there verify this for me ? > > Thanks > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49613&t=49105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
