The source-bridge transparent command is only needed if
you are bridging between the token-ring and ethernet on
the same router. It is not needed if you are using
dlsw to peer between, for instance, R1 token and R2
ether AND R1 ether and R3 ether/token.
The virtual ring is not required on the EN router.
Some configs had this on CCO but it doesn't do anything.
If there is no token-ring interface on the router, a
virtual ring is not needed, but the dlsw bridge-group
is.
Your understanding is correct.
two questions...thx in advance!
1. is the source-bridge transparent command required on the token ring
router when one dlsw peer is ethernet only the other dlsw peer is token
ring only (i.e., bet/ r1-e1 r2-to1)?
2. why is the virtual ring (500) required on the ethernet router in the
config below?
finally, i understand that in the following config, the source-bridge
transparent command is required bec/ ethernet token ring is off the same
router
!ethernet router:
source-bridge ring-group 500
dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 lf 1500
dlsw bridge-group 5
bridge-group 5 protocol ieee
!
int e0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
bridge-group 5
!ethernet/token ring router:
source-bridge ring-group 500
source-bridge transparent 500 1000 1 5
dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1 lf 1500
dlsw bridge-group 5
bridge-group 5 protocol ieee
!
int e1/2
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
bridge-group 5
!
int to0
ring-speed 16
source-bridge 7 1 500
source-bridge spanning
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964 (c)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46909t=46896
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]