RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
Cisco is working on the bug for only the per-packet option. This has been seen on the 6-port CT3 cards only. The default, per-destination works as it should...i.e. load balance. And it works fine..Just make sure that the queueing option is set to FIFO, no ip route-cache, no ip mroute-cache, no ip route-cache distributed. on the serials. And route 4 defaults out via the outbound serial intfs.Hope this helps! Regards, :-) From: Chuck Larrieu Reply-To: Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:56:41 -0400 I've seen comments along those lines over on the NANOG group, if that means anything ;- Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schneider, Matt Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16128t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15903t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
It will depend on your service provider. CEF has become much more stable in the latest IOS releases. Sprint uses CEF for load-balancing multiple T1s where the customer also has Cisco equipment. I don't know about other providers since I mainly deal with Sprint. Is there anyone else out there who can share their experiences with other ISPs? James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Scott M. Trieste To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15905t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15908t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
I've seen comments along those lines over on the NANOG group, if that means anything ;- Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schneider, Matt Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s. thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15924t=15692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
