RE: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
I thks to all of you for showing a helping hand. Really appreciate. Regrds. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27959t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
Quote Message not compatible with call state Message type Remote equipment received an unexpected message that does not correspond to the current state of the connection. This is usually due to a D-channel error. Unquote http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122sup/122de bug/dbfisdn.htm Perhaps you need to check this out with the telco assuming this is not a lab situation. Anthony Toh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have add in the ppp authenication chap command at both physical and logical interfaces. This is my output of debug q931 commnad : The message Message not compatible seems to be the problem, can anyone highlight me what does it mean ? 01:00:52: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/ 01:00:225504882236: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 bound to profile Dialer1 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Channel ID i = 0x89 01:00:52: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 01:00:52: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 unbound from profile Dialer1 01:00:52: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 5554000 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Channel ID i = 0x89 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing 01:00:52: ISDN BR0/0: RX STATUS pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:229799834060: Cause i = 0x80E5 - Message not compatible with call state or protocol error, threshold exceeded 01:00:227633266688: Call State i = 0x0B 01:00:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:54: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 01:00:234094816828: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 bound to profile Dialer1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27323t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
This may help: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/fr_isdn_backup.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27398t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
Try add int BRI0 subcommand 'ppp authentication chap' in both routers. This must be configured on both physical and logical interfaces. Anthony Toh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi,I am trying to configure two 2600 series routers to run in a Frame Relay network with an ISDN dial line as backup operation. The Frame Relay configuration is working alright but the ISDN is not. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27290t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
Well, the trouble that you are seeing is prolly caused when say for example you bring a SErial interface down on one end, but the switch(carrier network) reports the link as being up to the serial interface on the other end, so it doesnt switch to ISDN. I have seen this issue with particulary ATM circuits, wherein both the ends are isolated by switch(Carrier network) and the status is independent of either ends. The key is to use dialer watch and a dynamic routing protocol (pref. eigrp), which basically tracks the status of a route in the routing table, absence of which triggers a back up interface. So it doesnt rely on interface status. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27294t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem in router config ? [7:27288]
I have add in the ppp authenication chap command at both physical and logical interfaces. This is my output of debug q931 commnad : The message Message not compatible seems to be the problem, can anyone highlight me what does it mean ? 01:00:52: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/ 01:00:225504882236: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 bound to profile Dialer1 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Channel ID i = 0x89 01:00:52: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 01:00:52: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 unbound from profile Dialer1 01:00:52: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to 5554000 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Channel ID i = 0x89 01:00:223338299392: ISDN BR0/0: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:225504866764: Cause i = 0x8090 - Normal call clearing 01:00:52: ISDN BR0/0: RX STATUS pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:229799834060: Cause i = 0x80E5 - Message not compatible with call state or protocol error, threshold exceeded 01:00:227633266688: Call State i = 0x0B 01:00:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x9B 01:00:54: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 01:00:234094816828: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BRI0/0:1 bound to profile Dialer1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27297t=27288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
