RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]
Thank you Erick! > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 9:55 PM > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > I did some google searches and some site mentioned the > A-version is the same module but the components used > to make it were different and the cost was cheaper > then the original. > > --- Daniel Cotts wrote: > > Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on > > both a 5213 and a 5213A. > > No difference. I seem to remember that the "A" > > version fixed some flaws in > > the older blade. I have no idea what they might be. > > I've found the 5213 in a 1996 catalog. The 5213A is > > in the '98 catalog. If > > price wasn't much different, I'd go for the newer. > > > > Bill_Cat5505> sh port capabilities 4 > > ModelWS-X5213 > > Port 4/1 > > Type 10/100BaseTX > > Speedauto,10,100 > > Duplex half,full > > Trunk encap type ISL > > Trunk mode > > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > > Channel no > > Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) > > Flow control no > > Security yes > > Membership static,dynamic > > Fast start yes > > Rewrite no > > *** > > Left5K> sh port capabilities 2 > > ModelWS-X5213A > > Port 2/1 > > Type 10/100BaseTX > > Speedauto,10,100 > > Duplex half,full > > Trunk encap type ISL > > Trunk mode > > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > > Channel no > > Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) > > Flow control no > > Security yes > > Membership static,dynamic > > Fast start yes > > Rewrite no > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:21 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > > > > > > > Anyone know the difference between these two > > modules ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Phil > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38584&t=38546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]
I did some google searches and some site mentioned the A-version is the same module but the components used to make it were different and the cost was cheaper then the original. --- Daniel Cotts wrote: > Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on > both a 5213 and a 5213A. > No difference. I seem to remember that the "A" > version fixed some flaws in > the older blade. I have no idea what they might be. > I've found the 5213 in a 1996 catalog. The 5213A is > in the '98 catalog. If > price wasn't much different, I'd go for the newer. > > Bill_Cat5505> sh port capabilities 4 > ModelWS-X5213 > Port 4/1 > Type 10/100BaseTX > Speedauto,10,100 > Duplex half,full > Trunk encap type ISL > Trunk mode > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > Channel no > Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) > Flow control no > Security yes > Membership static,dynamic > Fast start yes > Rewrite no > *** > Left5K> sh port capabilities 2 > ModelWS-X5213A > Port 2/1 > Type 10/100BaseTX > Speedauto,10,100 > Duplex half,full > Trunk encap type ISL > Trunk mode > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > Channel no > Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) > Flow control no > Security yes > Membership static,dynamic > Fast start yes > Rewrite no > > > -Original Message- > > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:21 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > > > > Anyone know the difference between these two > modules ??? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38583&t=38546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]
Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on both a 5213 and a 5213A. No difference. I seem to remember that the "A" version fixed some flaws in the older blade. I have no idea what they might be. I've found the 5213 in a 1996 catalog. The 5213A is in the '98 catalog. If price wasn't much different, I'd go for the newer. Bill_Cat5505> sh port capabilities 4 ModelWS-X5213 Port 4/1 Type 10/100BaseTX Speedauto,10,100 Duplex half,full Trunk encap type ISL Trunk mode on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate Channel no Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) Flow control no Security yes Membership static,dynamic Fast start yes Rewrite no *** Left5K> sh port capabilities 2 ModelWS-X5213A Port 2/1 Type 10/100BaseTX Speedauto,10,100 Duplex half,full Trunk encap type ISL Trunk mode on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate Channel no Broadcast suppressionpps(0-15) Flow control no Security yes Membership static,dynamic Fast start yes Rewrite no > -Original Message- > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > Anyone know the difference between these two modules ??? > > > > Thanks > > Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38580&t=38546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]
I believe the A module supports ISL trunking where as the non-A version does not. ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone know the difference between these two modules ??? > > > > Thanks > > Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38552&t=38546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]
Phil, The ws-x5213a replaced the ws-x5213. They are both now end of life, but the 5213 was eol quite a while ago and is now unsupported (well it will be in a couple of weeks). Actual differences though I don't know - very similar to the eye. Gaz ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone know the difference between these two modules ??? > > > > Thanks > > Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38548&t=38546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
