Re: I took the beta (351-001) [7:42113]

2002-04-21 Thread nettable_walker

4/21/20024:00pmSunday

Any idea how long the old test will be out there ?
I took it a month ago & failed by 4 questions.  I was planning on retaking
it in late May.

Thanks,

Richard

//

""Dennis Laganiere""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I took the beta this afternoon, just to see how it compared to 350-001. I
> would like to share my perceptions; but please don't e-mail asking me to
> break
> the NDA, I won't.
>
> I found it to be significantly more challenging then the old exam,
requiring
> you to know the topics covered much more deeply then before.  I would be
> surprised if there isn't a considerable drop-off in the pass rate if what
I
> saw today is any indication of what the ready-for-prime-time version is
when
> it comes out.
>
> Finally some of the older technologies are dropping off, and as you can
see
> from the blueprint, new technologies have been added.  I also noticed that
> the
> questions have matured quite a bit, as if they pushed back some of the lab
> problems that were dropped in the transition to the one-day format.  If
you
> miss the troubleshooting section of the lab; you'll enjoy seeing it here.
>
> Keep in mind I've got a book out, as well as being one of the boson
authors,
> so I have a vested interest here - but my advice would be that if you are
> anywhere near ready, start cramming to take the old version before it goes
> away.  If you doubt my sincerity, spend the $50 and see if I'm kidding
about
> the new exam.
>
> Again, without breaking the NDA - I'd be curious if anybody had a
different
> experience.  Perhaps I perceived it as harder just because I've spent so
much
> time living with the old exam.
>
> Good luck all...
>
> -=- Dennis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42168&t=42113
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I took the beta (351-001) [7:42113]

2002-04-21 Thread Michael L. Williams

I was talking to the wife about that. I'd say (and I can't claim this is
accurate, just thinking out loud) since the Beta isn't over until May 6th,
and results won't come in until 6-8 weeks after that, I wouldn't expect to
see the "new" version take over until July or after.  but that's just my
thinking

>From what I've been reading here, I need to get down to business and pass
the written before the new regime... hehe
Still looking forward to taking the beta, if nothing else to get me up and
going before I take the current written...

Good luck!
Mike W.

"nettable_walker"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 4/21/20024:00pmSunday
>
> Any idea how long the old test will be out there ?
> I took it a month ago & failed by 4 questions.  I was planning on retaking
> it in late May.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
> //
>
> ""Dennis Laganiere""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I took the beta this afternoon, just to see how it compared to 350-001.
I
> > would like to share my perceptions; but please don't e-mail asking me to
> > break
> > the NDA, I won't.
> >
> > I found it to be significantly more challenging then the old exam,
> requiring
> > you to know the topics covered much more deeply then before.  I would be
> > surprised if there isn't a considerable drop-off in the pass rate if
what
> I
> > saw today is any indication of what the ready-for-prime-time version is
> when
> > it comes out.
> >
> > Finally some of the older technologies are dropping off, and as you can
> see
> > from the blueprint, new technologies have been added.  I also noticed
that
> > the
> > questions have matured quite a bit, as if they pushed back some of the
lab
> > problems that were dropped in the transition to the one-day format.  If
> you
> > miss the troubleshooting section of the lab; you'll enjoy seeing it
here.
> >
> > Keep in mind I've got a book out, as well as being one of the boson
> authors,
> > so I have a vested interest here - but my advice would be that if you
are
> > anywhere near ready, start cramming to take the old version before it
goes
> > away.  If you doubt my sincerity, spend the $50 and see if I'm kidding
> about
> > the new exam.
> >
> > Again, without breaking the NDA - I'd be curious if anybody had a
> different
> > experience.  Perhaps I perceived it as harder just because I've spent so
> much
> > time living with the old exam.
> >
> > Good luck all...
> >
> > -=- Dennis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42171&t=42113
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: I took the beta (351-001) [7:42113]

2002-04-21 Thread Dennis Laganiere

If you're getting ready for the old version I've written some stuff you can
grab for free from www.laganiere.net

There's a document on doing RIFs, advice for perparation and a few other
things I've put together.  Let me know if it helps...

Thanks...

--- Dennis

- Original Message -
From: "Michael L. Williams" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: I took the beta (351-001) [7:42113]


> I was talking to the wife about that. I'd say (and I can't claim this
is
> accurate, just thinking out loud) since the Beta isn't over until May 6th,
> and results won't come in until 6-8 weeks after that, I wouldn't expect to
> see the "new" version take over until July or after.  but that's just
my
> thinking
>
> From what I've been reading here, I need to get down to business and pass
> the written before the new regime... hehe
> Still looking forward to taking the beta, if nothing else to get me up and
> going before I take the current written...
>
> Good luck!
> Mike W.
>
> "nettable_walker"  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > 4/21/20024:00pmSunday
> >
> > Any idea how long the old test will be out there ?
> > I took it a month ago & failed by 4 questions.  I was planning on
retaking
> > it in late May.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > //
> >
> > ""Dennis Laganiere""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I took the beta this afternoon, just to see how it compared to
350-001.
> I
> > > would like to share my perceptions; but please don't e-mail asking me
to
> > > break
> > > the NDA, I won't.
> > >
> > > I found it to be significantly more challenging then the old exam,
> > requiring
> > > you to know the topics covered much more deeply then before.  I would
be
> > > surprised if there isn't a considerable drop-off in the pass rate if
> what
> > I
> > > saw today is any indication of what the ready-for-prime-time version
is
> > when
> > > it comes out.
> > >
> > > Finally some of the older technologies are dropping off, and as you
can
> > see
> > > from the blueprint, new technologies have been added.  I also noticed
> that
> > > the
> > > questions have matured quite a bit, as if they pushed back some of the
> lab
> > > problems that were dropped in the transition to the one-day format.
If
> > you
> > > miss the troubleshooting section of the lab; you'll enjoy seeing it
> here.
> > >
> > > Keep in mind I've got a book out, as well as being one of the boson
> > authors,
> > > so I have a vested interest here - but my advice would be that if you
> are
> > > anywhere near ready, start cramming to take the old version before it
> goes
> > > away.  If you doubt my sincerity, spend the $50 and see if I'm kidding
> > about
> > > the new exam.
> > >
> > > Again, without breaking the NDA - I'd be curious if anybody had a
> > different
> > > experience.  Perhaps I perceived it as harder just because I've spent
so
> > much
> > > time living with the old exam.
> > >
> > > Good luck all...
> > >
> > > -=- Dennis




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42174&t=42113
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]