Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
The router will first make a longest match comparison and thus match the 10.2.2.4/30 route. At 12:39 PM 7/24/2002 +, Antonio Montana wrote: >Hi, > >if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6 >and x.x.x.x is down. >Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its >lower AD of 202) and drop it all the time ?!? > >Or is it going to send it via y.y.y.y (ignoring the higer AD of 203) ? > >S 10.0.0.0/8 [202/0] via x.x.x.x >S 10.2.2.4/30 [203/0] via y.y.y.y > >thanks >monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49518&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
If x.x.x.x is down the static route is no longer valid and is purged unless you add the "permenant" keyword. Dave Antonio Montana wrote: > > Hi, > > if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6 > and x.x.x.x is down. > Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its > lower AD of 202) and drop it all the time ?!? > > Or is it going to send it via y.y.y.y (ignoring the higer AD of 203) ? > > S 10.0.0.0/8 [202/0] via x.x.x.x > S 10.2.2.4/30 [203/0] via y.y.y.y > > thanks > monti -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49523&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
MADMAN, what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ?? monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49524&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
It's up up but spoofing which doesn't count. Dave Antonio Montana wrote: > > MADMAN, > > what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but > BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ?? > > monti -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49527&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
I take that last email back!!! The static will be in your route table and if interesting it will activate the channel(s) Dave Antonio Montana wrote: > > MADMAN, > > what if x.x.x.x is an ip address from a BRI0 interface that is up/up but > BRI0:1 and BRI0:2 are down ?? > > monti -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49528&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
yep, it's in my routing table ... so, than the longest match has precedence over administrative distance like Peter van Oene replied, right ?? thanks a lot monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49529&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
That's actually not the fact. The router has no way of ever knowing whether x.x.x.x is down. I think MADMAN means that if x.x.x.x's corresponding route interface leaves up/up, only a 'permanent' route will persist. Jay greenberg On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 09:57, MADMAN wrote: > If x.x.x.x is down the static route is no longer valid and is purged > unless you add the "permenant" keyword. > > Dave > > Antonio Montana wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6 > > and x.x.x.x is down. > > Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its > > lower AD of 202) and drop it all the time ?!? > > > > Or is it going to send it via y.y.y.y (ignoring the higer AD of 203) ? > > > > S 10.0.0.0/8 [202/0] via x.x.x.x > > S 10.2.2.4/30 [203/0] via y.y.y.y > > > > thanks > > monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49531&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
a common misunderstanding. Administrative distance applies only to the process of placing routes into the routing table. It has nothing to do with the actual forwarding process. I.e. if identical OSPF, EIGRP, and static routes exist for the same destination, administrative distance determines with route is placed into the routing table. In your case, you have two different routes ( subnets of the same major net ) so both appear in the table. ""Antonio Montana"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > yep, > > it's in my routing table ... > so, than the longest match has precedence over administrative distance like > Peter van Oene replied, right ?? > > thanks a lot > monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49532&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Static routes ... [7:49517]
Here is the command. I tried it on a 7407 but it didn't work as advertised!! http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r/iprprt2/1rdindep.htm#1018069 Dave Jay Greenberg wrote: > > That's actually not the fact. The router has no way of ever knowing > whether x.x.x.x is down. I think MADMAN means that if x.x.x.x's > corresponding route interface leaves up/up, only a 'permanent' route > will persist. > > Jay greenberg > > On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 09:57, MADMAN wrote: > > If x.x.x.x is down the static route is no longer valid and is purged > > unless you add the "permenant" keyword. > > > > Dave > > > > Antonio Montana wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > if there is a packet for the destination 10.2.2.6 > > > and x.x.x.x is down. > > > Is the router permanently trying to send it via x.x.x.x (because of its > > > lower AD of 202) and drop it all the time ?!? > > > > > > Or is it going to send it via y.y.y.y (ignoring the higer AD of 203) ? > > > > > > S 10.0.0.0/8 [202/0] via x.x.x.x > > > S 10.2.2.4/30 [203/0] via y.y.y.y > > > > > > thanks > > > monti -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49571&t=49517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
