RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

2003-02-10 Thread timothy thielen
When studying for the CCIE with friends, we decided that if you forget the
broadcast keyword, the terrorists win.

--T


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62754t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

2003-02-06 Thread Dain Deutschman
Hello,

I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access
to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no
other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on
debug outputshere is the output...

sh frame pvc

PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)

  Active Inactive  Deleted   Static
  Local  1000
  Switched   0000
  Unused 0000

DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0

  input pkts 4100  output pkts 15   in bytes 288952
  out bytes 1560   dropped pkts 0   in FECN pkts 0
  in BECN pkts 0   out FECN pkts 0  out BECN pkts 0
  in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
  out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0
  5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08

sh frame map

Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static,
  IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active

deb ip packet

01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd
3
01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending

01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu
lation failed

Basic Encap Settings

encapsulation frame-relay ietf

frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf

frame-relay lmi-type ansi

Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be
greatly appreciated!! Thanks!!

--
Dain Deutschman
CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA
Data Communications Manager
New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
800.261.0475
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62614t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

2003-02-06 Thread Pedro A. do Valle
Dain,

another day I had the same problem... In my case I was using a static route
like this:

ip route x.x.x.x mask serial0/1

when I changed to

ip route x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y

 I got to solve the problem... You can try...

Pedro A. do Valle
Manaus - AM - Brazil
55 92 614 3105


- Original Message -
From: Dain Deutschman 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]


 Hello,

 I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access
 to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no
 other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on
 debug outputshere is the output...

 sh frame pvc

 PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)

   Active Inactive  Deleted   Static
   Local  1000
   Switched   0000
   Unused 0000

 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0

   input pkts 4100  output pkts 15   in bytes 288952
   out bytes 1560   dropped pkts 0   in FECN pkts 0
   in BECN pkts 0   out FECN pkts 0  out BECN pkts 0
   in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
   out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0
   5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08

 sh frame map

 Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static,
   IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active

 deb ip packet

 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd
 3
 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending

 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu
 lation failed

 Basic Encap Settings

 encapsulation frame-relay ietf

 frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf

 frame-relay lmi-type ansi

 Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be
 greatly appreciated!! Thanks!!

 --
 Dain Deutschman
 CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA
 Data Communications Manager
 New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
 800.261.0475
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62620t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

2003-02-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Dain Deutschman wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides
 internet access
 to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote
 peer...however, no
 other access to anywhere...

How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are you running a
routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What does show ip route display?

If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts, don't forget
to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement.

Priscilla

 further more...the encapsulation is
 failing on
 debug outputshere is the output...
 
 sh frame pvc
 
 PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)
 
   Active Inactive  Deleted   Static
   Local  1000
   Switched   0000
   Unused 0000
 
 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE
 = Serial0
 
   input pkts 4100  output pkts 15   in bytes
 288952
   out bytes 1560   dropped pkts 0   in FECN
 pkts 0
   in BECN pkts 0   out FECN pkts 0  out BECN
 pkts 0
   in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
   out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0
   5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed
 00:03:08
 
 sh frame map
 
 Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static,
   IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active
 
 deb ip packet
 
 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84,
 rcvd
 3
 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84,
 sending
 
 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84,
 encapsu
 lation failed
 
 Basic Encap Settings
 
 encapsulation frame-relay ietf
 
 frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf
 
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
 
 Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening
 would be
 greatly appreciated!! Thanks!!
 
 --
 Dain Deutschman
 CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA
 Data Communications Manager
 New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
 800.261.0475
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62623t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

2003-02-06 Thread Simmi Singh
Hi ,
I think the problem with routing issue as metioned by priscilla also and
others.
Either there is no route entry here i mean no static route to remote network
if u are
using static routing.
and if dynamic u need to enter brodacst key word.

and do check ur route -table

like example in route table entry should be like this

routing table:

destination newtowork  metric (static or dynamic)

This next hop address is mapped to your dlci and it should be otherwise 
Encapsulation failed error always comes in multipoint interface confguration.

as when u are sending packet to remote network at layer 3 the the next hop 
address is looked first  to reach remote network and then at layer 2 after
seeing
the frame-relay mapping the frame-relay packet is addressed with the dlci
number

Same error will also come when u remove your mapping and then check by 
pinging remote peer.

Hope this clears
if not then write in detail
Regards,


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
 
 Dain Deutschman wrote:
  
  Hello,
  
  I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides
  internet access
  to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote
  peer...however, no
  other access to anywhere...
 
 How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are
 you running a routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What
 does show ip route display?
 
 If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts,
 don't forget to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement.
 
 Priscilla
 
  further more...the encapsulation is
  failing on
  debug outputshere is the output...
  
  sh frame pvc
  
  PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)
  
Active Inactive  Deleted   Static
Local  1000
Switched   0000
Unused 0000
  
  DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE
  = Serial0
  
input pkts 4100  output pkts 15   in bytes
  288952
out bytes 1560   dropped pkts 0   in FECN
  pkts 0
in BECN pkts 0   out FECN pkts 0  out BECN
  pkts 0
in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0
5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed
  00:03:08
  
  sh frame map
  
  Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static,
IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active
  
  deb ip packet
  
  01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len
 84,
  rcvd
  3
  01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84,
  sending
  
  01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84,
  encapsu
  lation failed
  
  Basic Encap Settings
  
  encapsulation frame-relay ietf
  
  frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf
  
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
  
  Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening
  would be
  greatly appreciated!! Thanks!!
  
  --
  Dain Deutschman
  CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA
  Data Communications Manager
  New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
  800.261.0475
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62626t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]