Chuck,

I was just going over the steps laid out in caslow's book, do you think the
step 1, step 2, step 3 approach is better than the layered approach - layer
2, layer 3, access-list, etc.

Thanks.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Morabito" 
To: "Chuck Church" ; ;

Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776!


> Congrats!
>
> What did you do the last couple of months?  Practice speed?  Or maybe
> practice the many "little" things in IOS?
>
> Thanks!
>
> I too long for a good night sleep....
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Church" 
> To: ; 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM
> Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776!
>
>
> > All,
> >
> > I think the title says it all.  Took the lab today at RTP.  4th time
> > was the charm.  I don't know where to begin.  Might as well start with
the
> > thank you's.  Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass.  Thanks
> also
> > to those on the list that I've either studied with or have helped me out
> in
> > the past with problems.  Thanks also to Paul for putting this great list
> > together.  As far as how I prepared, I might as well give the whole
story.
> > Started working on Cisco about 2 1/2 years ago after going though the
> Novell
> > and MS Certs.  After getting NA, DA, NP, and DP, I passed the CCIE
written
> > in October 2000.  Without really knowing how to study or what to prepare
> > for, I got my butt handed to me in January at RTP.  Didn't know much
more
> > than your average CCNP would.  Tried again in April, but BGP killed me,
> and
> > again I didn't make it to day 2.  After that, I found a study partner
> > (Thanks Boris) and we worked pretty hard last summer.  Did all the
> bootcamp
> > labs, thought I knew everything I needed to.
> > November 4 of 2001, figured I'd breeze through the lab.  I don't
> > know if it's true, but I heard the first couple of months with the new 1
> day
> > format had a very low pass rate.  I know I could have used a couple more
> > hours to finish.  If anyone took the lab in Oct or Nov of last year and
> > failed, don't be discouraged.  I think they've scaled it back a little
> > nowadays.
> > Fast forwarding to today.  After spending a week with Val, Bruce,
> > and Fred at the NMC-1 course, and doing nothing but working on my speed,
I
> > felt pretty prepared.  Everything in the Doyle Volume 1 and Bruce/Val's
> book
> > made sense.  Though running a little low on sleep, I felt good this
> morning.
> > Roughly 4.5 hours into the test, we got lunch.  At that point I was done
> > with the IGP's and almost done with the EGP's.  In other words about 2/3
> of
> > the way done, by my estimate.  At 1:30 I was done, but needed to go back
> and
> > work on 3 things I couldn't figure out.  A little discussing with the
> > proctor, and 2 of them were fixed.  But then I think I read too much.  I
> had
> > solved a problem one way, but realized the wording of the question might
> > change what they were looking for.  Checking with the proctor, I got the
> > impression that he really didn't like my solution.  So there I am, 1.5
> hours
> > to go, and I'm making a somewhat major change :(  Looked OK, but with
1/2
> an
> > hour to go, I noticed a 'neighborship' bouncing up and down :o  10
minutes
> > to go, got it all working, but didn't get a chance to completely double
> > check all my other work as time expired.  I know I left 1 thing
> unconfigured
> > (a 2 pointer), but started wondering if I'd made other mistakes.  They
> said
> > to expect the results tomorrow afternoon.  A plane flight back to New
> York,
> > and there's the email waiting.  8776!
> > If anyone's wondering what I used to study, here's the short list:
> >
> > Groupstudy!  Paul's done a great job.  There are certain people on this
> list
> > that should be flagged as must-reads.  I won't mention any last names,
but
> > there are a couple guys named 'Brian' (both long-time CCIEs) that are a
> huge
> > asset to this list.  Thanks guys.
> >
> > Doyle - Volumes 1 and 2 - Everything you ever wanted to know about IP,
but
> > were afraid to ask.
> >
> > Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIEs - Bruce Caslow and Val
> Pavlichenko
> > - Used edition 2, but I understand 3 is coming out soon.  This book
covers
> > most everything.  I expect the new edition will cover more multicast and
> > QOS, and drop Appletalk and DECnet.  But still the most useful book I've
> > found.
> >
> > Halabi - Used 1st edition, but everything I was asked to do with BGP is
in
> > that book.
> >
> > Bootcamp labs - Worked though these with a partner, because his company
> was
> > cool enough to buy them for him, and my company wasn't!  Great
preparation
> > and simulation for the test.
> >
> > Various docs from CCO - Might as well go to the source!
> >
> > Most importantly - NMC-1 http://www.netmasterclass.net/nmc/  Bruce and
Val
> > explain the most difficult subjects very well.  A couple of things are a
> > little lacking in the book, but they cover those very well in the class.
> Be
> > prepared to work your a** off that week though.  8:30AM to 11PM is the
> norm
> > that week.  But I highly recommend it, especially if you've come close
to
> > passing before.
> >
> > Well, sorry to ramble on so much.  I'm off to bed for a L O N G
> > sleep.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> >
> > Chuck Church
> > CCIE 8776
> > CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > Magnacom Technologies
> > 140 N. Rt. 303
> > Valley Cottage, NY 10989
> > 845-267-4000 x218
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
> > Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Comercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
> Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35648&t=35648
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to