Win2k and PIX IPSec?

2001-02-09 Thread Ben Hockenhull

Has anyone sucessfully set up an IPSec tunnel between a Windows 2000
client running the native Win2k IPSec stack and a PIX?  If so, do you
have a sample config?

I'm able to establish an SA between the PIX and the Win2k box, but I'm
unable to pass traffic.  For instance, a ping from inside the PIX to the
Win2k box outside the PIX results in an SA being established, but the
packets are not passed, and a debug shows a "check crypto map deny".

The access lists for nat 0 and for the encrypted traffic are identical and
applied.

Pix code 5.2.x.

Thanks

Ben


--
Ben Hockenhull
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win2k and PIX IPSec?

2001-02-09 Thread Kenny Sallee

I've had that error before.  It was between 2 PIX's though.  The fix ( on
both sides ) was to do a "clear crypto ipsec sa" and "clear crypto isakmp
sa".  And then it worked.  It was like the SA's got outa sync or something.
Or one side had a valid SA and the other didn't.  On a side note - have you
tried to use 'pl-compatable' instead of NAT 0?  Pl-compat bypasses all
translation and conduit requirements, effectivly terminating the tunnel on
the inside interface or whichever interface the traffic is destined for.

Kenny

"Ben Hockenhull" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone sucessfully set up an IPSec tunnel between a Windows 2000
 client running the native Win2k IPSec stack and a PIX?  If so, do you
 have a sample config?

 I'm able to establish an SA between the PIX and the Win2k box, but I'm
 unable to pass traffic.  For instance, a ping from inside the PIX to the
 Win2k box outside the PIX results in an SA being established, but the
 packets are not passed, and a debug shows a "check crypto map deny".

 The access lists for nat 0 and for the encrypted traffic are identical and
 applied.

 Pix code 5.2.x.

 Thanks

 Ben


 --
 Ben Hockenhull
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Win2k and PIX IPSec?

2001-02-09 Thread Christopher Larson

I have not done it in awhile, and I don't have a config. However, when I did
do it you had to setup an l2tp tunnel first between win2k and the router and
then run ipsec through the l2tp tunnel.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Hockenhull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win2k and PIX IPSec?


Has anyone sucessfully set up an IPSec tunnel between a Windows 2000
client running the native Win2k IPSec stack and a PIX?  If so, do you
have a sample config?

I'm able to establish an SA between the PIX and the Win2k box, but I'm
unable to pass traffic.  For instance, a ping from inside the PIX to the
Win2k box outside the PIX results in an SA being established, but the
packets are not passed, and a debug shows a "check crypto map deny".

The access lists for nat 0 and for the encrypted traffic are identical and
applied.

Pix code 5.2.x.

Thanks

Ben


--
Ben Hockenhull
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]