RE: Would double telnet work? [7:676]

2001-04-16 Thread West, Karl

I am not sure if the Netgear/Linksys does it but I know the Netopia routers
do it!!

http://www.netopia.com/equipment/routers/r9100/index.html

Karl

-Original Message-
From: Fred Danson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Would double telnet work? [7:676]


Hey Group,

This is a continuation of the NAT capabilities of small Netgear/Linksys 
router Post. I am curious, would it be possible for me to do a telnet from 
my remote site to the small router, and then do another telnet from the 
small router to the inside devices? This would pretty much be a double 
telnet (if there is such a thing). Does anyone know if most of these small 
routers support outgoing telnet sessions?

Thanks again for the help,
Fred
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=804t=676
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Would double telnet work? [7:676]

2001-04-14 Thread Fred Danson

Hey Group,

This is a continuation of the NAT capabilities of small Netgear/Linksys 
router Post. I am curious, would it be possible for me to do a telnet from 
my remote site to the small router, and then do another telnet from the 
small router to the inside devices? This would pretty much be a double 
telnet (if there is such a thing). Does anyone know if most of these small 
routers support outgoing telnet sessions?

Thanks again for the help,
Fred
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=676t=676
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Would double telnet work? [7:676]

2001-04-14 Thread Jason J. Roysdon

I don't know that they do, but the Linksys does support port redirection.
Just point the standard telnet port (23) at your inside router.  Once on one
inside router you can telnet around to others inside, or you can also point
other ports from the outside to inside port 23.  The biggest limitation that
the Linksys has is that it can only handle one public address (I don't know
if the NetGear or anything else can handle more).  Not really a big deal
unless you've got a bunch of gamers that want to be able to play against
each other and the outside world, and they need to have the same outside
public port mapped to play.

Anyway, here is what you could do
PublicPrivate
63.1.1.1 :23192.168.1.23 :23
63.1.1.1 :24192.168.1.24 :23
63.1.1.1 :25192.168.1.25 :23
63.1.1.1 :26192.168.1.26 :23

Of course, you might want to pick better ports, but if you don't care about
housing services public services on the inside, it should work.

My personal suggestion would be to set up an old 486 and run Linux and SSHv2
so that you can SSH in on port 22, and once on the Linux box on the inside,
telnet to your routers.  That way it's all encrypted and no chance of
someone hijacking your lab.  Plus, you can log all the connections to the
Linux box and have a user list to control access.  Of course, there is a
little bit of a learning curve to get that configured, but it's not that bad
with RH7 and a standard NIC.

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



""Fred Danson""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hey Group,

 This is a continuation of the NAT capabilities of small Netgear/Linksys
 router Post. I am curious, would it be possible for me to do a telnet from
 my remote site to the small router, and then do another telnet from the
 small router to the inside devices? This would pretty much be a double
 telnet (if there is such a thing). Does anyone know if most of these small
 routers support outgoing telnet sessions?

 Thanks again for the help,
 Fred
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=679t=676
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Would double telnet work? [7:676]

2001-04-14 Thread Kevin Wigle

The Linksys lets you do the following:

incoming port (on wan interface) is redirected to inside ip (no port
configurable)

The incoming port can be further distinguished as udp/tcp/both

10 ports (or ranges of ports) that can be redirected to an inside ip
address.

Kevin Wigle


- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Roysdon" 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, 14 April, 2001 21:04
Subject: Re: Would double telnet work? [7:676]


 I don't know that they do, but the Linksys does support port redirection.
 Just point the standard telnet port (23) at your inside router.  Once on
one
 inside router you can telnet around to others inside, or you can also
point
 other ports from the outside to inside port 23.  The biggest limitation
that
 the Linksys has is that it can only handle one public address (I don't
know
 if the NetGear or anything else can handle more).  Not really a big deal
 unless you've got a bunch of gamers that want to be able to play against
 each other and the outside world, and they need to have the same outside
 public port mapped to play.

 Anyway, here is what you could do
 PublicPrivate
 63.1.1.1 :23192.168.1.23 :23
 63.1.1.1 :24192.168.1.24 :23
 63.1.1.1 :25192.168.1.25 :23
 63.1.1.1 :26192.168.1.26 :23

 Of course, you might want to pick better ports, but if you don't care
about
 housing services public services on the inside, it should work.

 My personal suggestion would be to set up an old 486 and run Linux and
SSHv2
 so that you can SSH in on port 22, and once on the Linux box on the
inside,
 telnet to your routers.  That way it's all encrypted and no chance of
 someone hijacking your lab.  Plus, you can log all the connections to the
 Linux box and have a user list to control access.  Of course, there is a
 little bit of a learning curve to get that configured, but it's not that
bad
 with RH7 and a standard NIC.

 --
 Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
 List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



 ""Fred Danson""  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hey Group,
 
  This is a continuation of the NAT capabilities of small Netgear/Linksys
  router Post. I am curious, would it be possible for me to do a telnet
from
  my remote site to the small router, and then do another telnet from the
  small router to the inside devices? This would pretty much be a double
  telnet (if there is such a thing). Does anyone know if most of these
small
  routers support outgoing telnet sessions?
 
  Thanks again for the help,
  Fred
  _
  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=690t=676
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]