My final reply on this.

""Kelly Hair""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jason -
>
>Regarding your barb on
> Unix experts should be CCIEs -  by the same token we should could also
state
> that all NT admins are on the same level as all script kiddies...
Please...
> there are some good/great NT admins out there who are very technical.

I'm very glad you finally agree. See, it's not that difficult.. in case you
have not notice, this whole thread started with some silly "unix guru"
putting down NT people. :-)


>
> You never answered the Windows 3.1 AS question...   Would you trust your
> Enterprise to this?

To answer your Q, I have run enterprise on this. I have moved on, (which is
something you should think about....)

> There are Unix systems that are still running from
> that um.. time period.  For some fun reading, Jason, check out
> http://www.sciam.com/1998/1198issue/1198techbus2.html   Perhaps the link
is
> a little old but it is one example of how many organizations are
attempting
> to use Windows NT in the Enterprise.  Hopefully, the IRS does not...
Then
> again, 4 billion later and they still have problems perhaps that could be
> their new answer.   If only that flat tax would pass... sigh...

I still have DOS running ocassionally, as have been mentioned before, all OS
has it's place..... So stick that in your thick skull....

>
> If Cisco is working on a GUI then they are going the same path as Lucent
and
> others before them.   I cannot wait until the know it all manager
configures
> the network and does not understand why it doesn't work... I mean.. all
the
> pretty lines with a thunderbolt connected to a ring here and a bar
there...
> Guess there will always be work for IT folks :)

So the reason why Cisco should be working on a GUI is so that there will be
work for pple like you ?

>
> One last thing.. could you send me some mail offline from this mailing
list?
> You are listed as an anonymous poster and I would love to continue this
> conversation in a more private forum.

In fact, let's don't even continue this conversation, public or private.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6936&t=6936
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to