RE: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am pretty sure that the 2950's only support dot1q trunking and Cisco never
plans to change that.  I remember reading that in an article.  The 2950's
are basically taking over the 1900 series which is ironic because the 1900's
only support isl.  We personally use dot1q on all our trunks because you can
do more with traffic prioritization with dot1q headers.

-Original Message-
From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

Hi,
 
Any one else noticed that on the 2950, and I guessing other catalyst low end
switch's, that one cant define the encapsulation of the trunk link. Yes it
will auto negotiate, however I feel that control has been pulled away from
me. I also dont like on the 4006, that you can only define this same setting
(if you have a GBIC Module) for the first 2 GBIC ports. The rest of the
ports default to dot1q. Thankfully I use this, but I am betting that there
are the odd people out there who may use ISL...
 
Can some one tell me, is possible, how to define what type of trunk I wish
to use on the 2950 using IOS 12.1(11)
 
Thanks all
 
John
(please correct where I am wrong)


**

visit http://www.solution6.com

UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

**

The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises.
Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details.

Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666

General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555

**

This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot
use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case, please
notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of
Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.

*




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63507t=63466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-21 Thread Robert Edmonds
The reason that the 2950's do not support ISL trunking is that Cisco is
gradually moving towards supporting the major standards more and proprietary
standards less.  As part of this plan they are beginning to make switches
that only support dot1q trunking.  At least that's what a TAC engineer told
me.  However, this brought up the question, What about EIGRP?  He assured
me that some of the proprietary stuff like EIGRP, where there is a real
tangible benefit to using it, will stay.

Robert

John Brandis  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 Any one else noticed that on the 2950, and I guessing other catalyst low
end
 switch's, that one cant define the encapsulation of the trunk link. Yes it
 will auto negotiate, however I feel that control has been pulled away from
 me. I also dont like on the 4006, that you can only define this same
setting
 (if you have a GBIC Module) for the first 2 GBIC ports. The rest of the
 ports default to dot1q. Thankfully I use this, but I am betting that there
 are the odd people out there who may use ISL...

 Can some one tell me, is possible, how to define what type of trunk I wish
 to use on the 2950 using IOS 12.1(11)

 Thanks all

 John
 (please correct where I am wrong)


 **

 visit http://www.solution6.com

 UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

 **

 The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises.
 Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details.

 Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

 General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666

 General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555

 **

 This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
 confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
cannot
 use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
please
 notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
 message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
 this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
of
 Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.

 *




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63509t=63466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-21 Thread Larry Letterman
Robert is correct, Cisco is moving to the gear to support
most of the standards. Most of the new switches
will be on Dot1q/Dot1p since thats the standard for layer
2EIGRP is still in use by a lot of places so I
believe it will stay for a good while..

Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems


- Original Message -
From: Robert Edmonds 
To: 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]


 The reason that the 2950's do not support ISL trunking is
that Cisco is
 gradually moving towards supporting the major standards
more and proprietary
 standards less.  As part of this plan they are beginning
to make switches
 that only support dot1q trunking.  At least that's what a
TAC engineer told
 me.  However, this brought up the question, What about
EIGRP?  He assured
 me that some of the proprietary stuff like EIGRP, where
there is a real
 tangible benefit to using it, will stay.

 Robert

 John Brandis  wrote in message
 news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Hi,
 
  Any one else noticed that on the 2950, and I guessing
other catalyst low
 end
  switch's, that one cant define the encapsulation of the
trunk link. Yes it
  will auto negotiate, however I feel that control has
been pulled away from
  me. I also dont like on the 4006, that you can only
define this same
 setting
  (if you have a GBIC Module) for the first 2 GBIC ports.
The rest of the
  ports default to dot1q. Thankfully I use this, but I am
betting that there
  are the odd people out there who may use ISL...
 
  Can some one tell me, is possible, how to define what
type of trunk I wish
  to use on the 2950 using IOS 12.1(11)
 
  Thanks all
 
  John
  (please correct where I am wrong)
 
 
 

**
 
  visit http://www.solution6.com
 
  UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
 
 

**
 
  The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved
premises.
  Please make sure you have updated your records with our
new details.
 
  Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.
 
  General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666
 
  General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555
 
 

**
 
  This email message (and attachments) may contain
information that is
  confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended
recipient you
 cannot
  use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In
such a case,
 please
  notify the sender by return email immediately and erase
all copies of the
  message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and
other information in
  this message and attachments that do not relate to the
official business
 of
  Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
 
 

*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63519t=63466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-20 Thread John Brandis
Hi,
 
Any one else noticed that on the 2950, and I guessing other catalyst low end
switch's, that one cant define the encapsulation of the trunk link. Yes it
will auto negotiate, however I feel that control has been pulled away from
me. I also dont like on the 4006, that you can only define this same setting
(if you have a GBIC Module) for the first 2 GBIC ports. The rest of the
ports default to dot1q. Thankfully I use this, but I am betting that there
are the odd people out there who may use ISL...
 
Can some one tell me, is possible, how to define what type of trunk I wish
to use on the 2950 using IOS 12.1(11)
 
Thanks all
 
John
(please correct where I am wrong)


**

visit http://www.solution6.com

UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

**

The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises.
Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details.

Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666

General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555

**

This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot
use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case, please
notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of
Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.

*




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63466t=63466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-20 Thread Jose Canillas
I read somewhere on cisco.com that the 2950s do not support ISL (it's true,
I tested it) the 2912 and 2924 series support both (2916M need a special
module for trunk), an the 1900XL series just support ISL (also tested). I'm
not sure about the 2820 series but as I think they woul have the same
trunking feature as the 1900 series.
 Somewhere on cisco.com is a doc page about the trunking features along the
different generations of low end switches

Regards,

Jose


John Brandis  escribis en el mensaje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 Any one else noticed that on the 2950, and I guessing other catalyst low
end
 switch's, that one cant define the encapsulation of the trunk link. Yes it
 will auto negotiate, however I feel that control has been pulled away from
 me. I also dont like on the 4006, that you can only define this same
setting
 (if you have a GBIC Module) for the first 2 GBIC ports. The rest of the
 ports default to dot1q. Thankfully I use this, but I am betting that there
 are the odd people out there who may use ISL...

 Can some one tell me, is possible, how to define what type of trunk I wish
 to use on the 2950 using IOS 12.1(11)

 Thanks all

 John
 (please correct where I am wrong)


 **

 visit http://www.solution6.com

 UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk

 **

 The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises.
 Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details.

 Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

 General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666

 General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555

 **

 This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is
 confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you
cannot
 use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a case,
please
 notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the
 message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other information in
 this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
of
 Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.

 *




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63468t=63466
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]