It depends on if your going to use it as a peer with an ISP. I wouldnt
recommend a 1720, but if its stand alone with only static routes to it, you
can live with a 26xx. If you plan on running BGP with full routes or even
partial routes, your router will die.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Serhat Erkan
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 8:18 PM
To: Gabriel Nickel; groupstudy
Subject: RE: compression 800/1720/2620
For Cisco 800, it is unavailable, because of 800's max serial speed is 512
Kbps (for non-compress data). But 1720 /2620, i say only MAYBE.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Nickel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:18 AM
To: groupstudy
Subject: compression 800/1720/2620
Hi group
Got a question regarding compression:
Can a Cisco 800, 1720 or 2620 (without AIM) provide ppp (payload)compression
for a 2mbit serial line? I dont know if the processor
is able to handle this...
I would appreciate answers from the practical viewpoint.
thanks in advance,
Gabriel
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
