Re: hsrp isl trunking [7:58144]

2002-11-26 Thread Chuck Church
Dennis,

It's better to have a unique HSRP group for each VLAN.  Cisco bases the
virtual MAC address on the group.  If you reuse the group number, you'll have
duplicate MAC addresses.  Granted, they're on seperate VLANs and shouldn't
matter, but I had a Cat4000 that didn't like it at all, and gave me lots of
logged messages about MACs moving around.

Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58144t=58144
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: hsrp isl trunking [7:58144]

2002-11-26 Thread Larry Letterman
And..
on the new msfc-2 you only get 16 hsrp groups
supposedly the issue that chuck states below is
not an issue with the new msfc-2 for the 6509's

Chuck Church wrote:

Dennis,

It's better to have a unique HSRP group for each VLAN.  Cisco bases the
virtual MAC address on the group.  If you reuse the group number, you'll
have
duplicate MAC addresses.  Granted, they're on seperate VLANs and shouldn't
matter, but I had a Cat4000 that didn't like it at all, and gave me lots of
logged messages about MACs moving around.

Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58151t=58144
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: hsrp isl trunking [7:58144]

2002-11-26 Thread Chuck Church
I think the 'use-bia' may have been a fix for the problem as well.  It's
been a while since it happened.  For all I know it might have been a problem
with the CatOS on the switch.

Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE


- Original Message -
From: Larry Letterman 
To: Chuck Church 
Cc: 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: hsrp  isl trunking [7:58144]


 And..
 on the new msfc-2 you only get 16 hsrp groups
 supposedly the issue that chuck states below is
 not an issue with the new msfc-2 for the 6509's

 Chuck Church wrote:

 Dennis,
 
 It's better to have a unique HSRP group for each VLAN.  Cisco bases
the
 virtual MAC address on the group.  If you reuse the group number, you'll
have
 duplicate MAC addresses.  Granted, they're on seperate VLANs and
shouldn't
 matter, but I had a Cat4000 that didn't like it at all, and gave me lots
of
 logged messages about MACs moving around.
 
 Chuck Church
 CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58153t=58144
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]