"no weighted fair-queue" ?
Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response. Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in WFQ whereby switching it off was a better option ? I havn't myself, but I'm curious. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?
I haven't heard of a WFQ bug, but to my knowledge FIFO is no longer the default queuring. Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:17 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response. Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in WFQ whereby switching it off was a better option ? I havn't myself, but I'm curious. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?
You might also try a command like this: priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp telnet Dave -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:15 PM To: 'Phil Barker'; cisco GroupStudy Subject: RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ? I haven't heard of a WFQ bug, but to my knowledge FIFO is no longer the default queuring. Hth, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:17 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response. Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in WFQ whereby switching it off was a better option ? I havn't myself, but I'm curious. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ?
When 11.2 first came out I had several instances where I had to turn off WFQ. I don't recall the bug number, but that used to be one of the first things the TAC would ask you to do when having a problem with early 11.2 code. What do you mean by you need a good telnet response? Do you have an application that uses telnet or do you mean telnet access to the router? If you need telnet access to the router turn on 'service nagle'. Regards, Aaron K. Dixon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phil Barker Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:17 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? Hi gang, I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. i.e I need a good telnet response. Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in WFQ whereby switching it off was a better option ? I havn't myself, but I'm curious. Regards, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "no weighted fair-queue" ?
Hi, I had troubles with WFQ in IOS 11.2 connecting with a Frame Relay Switch. The LMI packets timeout because were being sended after the normal traffic. Ivan Centeno Network Manager. David Jones escribió en mensaje <4B91EE6CA935D411AEBD0090279A940B13BEF5@DSM-EXCH>... >You might also try a command like this: priority-list 1 protocol ip high >tcp telnet > >Dave > >-Original Message- >From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 1:15 PM >To: 'Phil Barker'; cisco GroupStudy >Subject: RE: "no weighted fair-queue" ? > > >I haven't heard of a WFQ bug, but to my knowledge FIFO is no longer the >default queuring. > >Hth, > >Ole > > > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 11:17 AM >To: cisco GroupStudy >Subject: "no weighted fair-queue" ? > > >Hi gang, > I just spotted this in one of our configs, set on >all the Serial interfaces. I know this will default to >FIFO which I could do without, for obvious reasons. >i.e I need a good telnet response. > Has anyone heard of a BUG in 11.2 series IOS in >WFQ whereby switching it off was a better option ? >I havn't myself, but I'm curious. > >Regards, > >Phil. > > > > >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk >or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >___ >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
