ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
Hi All, I have the following addresses 152.1.1.65/32 152.1.1.97/27 152.1.1.72/32 152.1.1.69/32 152.1.2.2/30 and have created 2 summary addresses of 152.1.1.0 /24 and 152.1.2.0/24 so that i can redistribute them into an igrp process that is addressed with a 24bit mask. The summary routes appear when I use show ip ospf summary-address, they do not appear in ospf routing table and are not redistributed into igrp. Is this because the routes that make up the summary have a longer mask than the summary and therefore not entered into the ospf routing table Any thoughts appreciated Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16357t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
Hello Richard , You r right the longest prefix match is taken as the best route. Vijendra Richard Botham wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, I have the following addresses 152.1.1.65/32 152.1.1.97/27 152.1.1.72/32 152.1.1.69/32 152.1.2.2/30 and have created 2 summary addresses of 152.1.1.0 /24 and 152.1.2.0/24 so that i can redistribute them into an igrp process that is addressed with a 24bit mask. The summary routes appear when I use show ip ospf summary-address, they do not appear in ospf routing table and are not redistributed into igrp. Is this because the routes that make up the summary have a longer mask than the summary and therefore not entered into the ospf routing table Any thoughts appreciated Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16360t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
the summary-address command is for summarization of routes *into* OSPF (at an ASBR). If you want to summarize *out of* OSPF, you'll need to dig a little deeper. Hint 1: consider configuring your summary route using the target routing protocol instead of the source routing protocol Hint 2: Get a copy of Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Volume 1 for in-depth treatment of redistribution, especially the metric matching between protocols -e- - Original Message - From: Richard Botham To: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:11 AM Subject: ospf summary address issue [7:16357] Hi All, I have the following addresses 152.1.1.65/32 152.1.1.97/27 152.1.1.72/32 152.1.1.69/32 152.1.2.2/30 and have created 2 summary addresses of 152.1.1.0 /24 and 152.1.2.0/24 so that i can redistribute them into an igrp process that is addressed with a 24bit mask. The summary routes appear when I use show ip ospf summary-address, they do not appear in ospf routing table and are not redistributed into igrp. Is this because the routes that make up the summary have a longer mask than the summary and therefore not entered into the ospf routing table Any thoughts appreciated Richard _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16387t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ospf summary address issue [7:16357]
All, Thanks for your help - I KNEW THIS - WHAT WAS I THINKING OF. Sorry to have wasted your time Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16389t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
